We chose anisotropic voxels and the above orientation of the imaging volume for EPI to optimize spatial sampling for the LC (for details, see de Gee et al., 2017 (link)). The LC is an elongated structure with small diameter (a few millimeters) and comparably large longitudinal extent (~15 mm) along the floor of the fourth ventricle (Betts et al., 2019 (link)). The rationale was that the LC was the smallest brainstem nucleus to be assessed here.
Functional MRI of the Locus Coeruleus
We chose anisotropic voxels and the above orientation of the imaging volume for EPI to optimize spatial sampling for the LC (for details, see de Gee et al., 2017 (link)). The LC is an elongated structure with small diameter (a few millimeters) and comparably large longitudinal extent (~15 mm) along the floor of the fourth ventricle (Betts et al., 2019 (link)). The rationale was that the LC was the smallest brainstem nucleus to be assessed here.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of Amsterdam
Other organizations : Spinoza Centre for Neuroimaging
Variable analysis
- Magnetic field strength (3 T)
- MRI data
- Philips Achieva XT MRI scanner
- 32-channel dStream head coil
- Single-shot, 2D gradient echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence
- In-plane resolution (2 × 2 mm)
- Slice thickness (3 mm, no gaps)
- Field of view (192 × 192 × 99 mm)
- TR (2 s)
- TE (27.62 ms)
- Flip angle (76.1°)
- SENSE acceleration factor (3.0)
- Bandwidth (2,213 Hz/pixel)
- T1-weighted structural scan (voxel size: 1 × 1 × 1 mm^3, TR = 8.13 ms, TE = 3.7 ms, flip angle = 8°)
- B0-field map (voxel size: 2 × 2 × 2 mm^3, TR = 10.85 ms, TE = 3.03, flip angle = 8°)
- Slice acquisition order (ascending, foot to head)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!