Donor effects were aligned as described in step (1) above. For FB and neuronal cells, sources were aligned as described in step (3) above. Leiden clustering and UMAP visualization were performed for identifying subpopulations and visualization86 (link). Differentially expressed genes were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Genes were ranked by score.
Subpopulation Analysis of Cardiac and Neural Cells
Donor effects were aligned as described in step (1) above. For FB and neuronal cells, sources were aligned as described in step (3) above. Leiden clustering and UMAP visualization were performed for identifying subpopulations and visualization86 (link). Differentially expressed genes were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Genes were ranked by score.
Corresponding Organization : German Centre for Cardiovascular Research
Other organizations : Wellcome Sanger Institute, Max Delbrück Center, Harvard University, Imperial College London, Sun Yat-sen University, University of Alberta
Protocol cited in 22 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Cell population-specific filtering criteria applied to nuclei: cardiomyocyte counts (n_counts <12,500), genes (n_genes <4,000), mitochondrial genes (percent_mito <1%), ribosomal genes (percent_ribo <1%) and scrublet score (scrublet_score <0.25); FB mitochondrial genes (percent_mito <1%), ribosomal genes (percent_ribo <1%); neuronal cell genes (n_genes <4000), mitochondrial genes (percent_mito <1%), ribosomal genes (percent_ribo <1%)
- Splitting of cardiomyocytes and FBs into two groupings based on the region of origin: (1) left and right atrium, and (2) left and right ventricles, apex and interventricular septum
- Subpopulation of cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and neural cells
- Differentially expressed genes calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test
- Total and CD45+ cells were excluded in the atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes datasets
- No further filtering of FBs or neuronal cell total and CD45+ cells was applied
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!