Children were weighed in kilograms and had their height measured in meters by trained field workers at their homes. The field workers were employed by the South African Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU) at the University of Cape Town. Stunting was defined as height-for-age, and overweight was defined as body mass index (BMI) for age. The WHO child growth standards and the WHO AnthroPlus software were used to compute the indicators for child malnutrition [38 ]. Children with a z-score of ≤−2 were classified as being stunted, and children presenting with a z-score of ≥2 were classified as overweight/obese [38 ].
Assessing Child Malnutrition in South Africa
Children were weighed in kilograms and had their height measured in meters by trained field workers at their homes. The field workers were employed by the South African Labour and Development Research Unit (SALDRU) at the University of Cape Town. Stunting was defined as height-for-age, and overweight was defined as body mass index (BMI) for age. The WHO child growth standards and the WHO AnthroPlus software were used to compute the indicators for child malnutrition [38 ]. Children with a z-score of ≤−2 were classified as being stunted, and children presenting with a z-score of ≥2 were classified as overweight/obese [38 ].
Corresponding Organization : University of Johannesburg
Other organizations : Federal University Oye Ekiti
Variable analysis
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Stunting (height-for-age)
- Overweight (body mass index (BMI) for age)
- Age of children (0-59 months)
- Measurement of weight in kilograms and height in meters by trained field workers
- Use of WHO child growth standards and WHO AnthroPlus software to compute indicators for child malnutrition
- Not specified
- Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!