Most sociodemographic variables (except income) were obtained from the baseline phone interview, whereas most health questions (except subjective health, smoking, and drinking behaviors) were obtained from the SAQ. The latter was completed by 87% of the RDD respondents and 92% of the twin and sibling respondents. Thus, the present analysis is limited to those individuals with complete data across the predictors and who participated in both waves of the phone survey. Under these criteria, the sample sizes were as follows—RDD: n = 3,140; Twin: n = 1,520;
Predictors of Survey Participation and Retention
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of Wisconsin–Madison
Protocol cited in 24 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Age (continuous)
- Gender (0 = male, 1 = female)
- Marital status (0 = not married, 1 = married)
- Race (0 = minority, 1 = White)
- Educational level (1 = less than high school, 2 = high school graduate or equivalent, 3 = some college, 4 = college graduate or more)
- Personal income (continuous)
- County size (1 = 21 largest MSAs, 2 = MSA greater than 85,000 households, 3 = MSA greater than 20,000 households, 4 = remaining counties)
- Subjective physical health rating (1 = poor, 2 = fair, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent)
- Count of the number of chronic conditions
- Count of functional limitations (instrumental activities of daily living [IADL])
- Body mass index (BMI; continuous)
- Drinking (0 = ever drink 3+ days/week, 1 = never drank 3+ days/week)
- Smoking history (1 = currently smoke, 2 = smoked in past, 3 = never smoked)
- Health insurance coverage (1 = no coverage, 2 = government coverage, 3 = private coverage)
- Count of the number of physician visits in the prior year
- Alternative medicine/therapy use (0 = did not use any in prior year, 1 = used at least one in prior year)
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!