Lineage-Specific Conservation of Regulatory Regions
Lineage-specific conservation of regulatory regions (Table S4) was determined for primates, rodents, ungulates, and carnivores using a similar strategy as that for highly conserved elements (FigureĀ 6). ChIP-seq enriched regions were compared between a reference species (human, mouse, cow, and dog) and other species in the clade using either the EPO multiple alignment when possible or pairwise Lastz alignments otherwise. Elements functionally conserved across the high-quality genomes in each lineage, but not in any other species, were identified for each histone mark (i.e., in human, macaque, and marmoset for primates; mouse, rat, and rabbit for rodents; cow and pig for ungulates; and dog and cat for carnivores). These were then categorised into lineage-specific promoters and enhancers based on their dominant histone mark enrichment across species within the clade, as described above. Recently evolved promoters and enhancers were determined for a reference species in each lineage (human, mouse, cow, and dog). Enriched regions in the reference species that showed functional conservation in any alignable species were discarded. The number of species that were used for comparison with each reference species was 18 (human), 12 (mouse), 12 (cow) and 10 (dog). These include: (1) nine species in the 13 eutherian mammals EPO multiple alignment, (2) other species within the clade, evaluated with ad hoc LastZ pairwise alignments with the reference species (e.g., mouse-guinea pig, mouse-naked mole rat and mouse-tree shrew) and (3) all other species but naked mole rat for human, using pairwise LastZ alignments. Recently evolved elements were then categorised into promoters and enhancers by overlapping the two histone marks in each reference species. Recently evolved elements were similarly identified for two non-reference species (naked mole rat and dolphin). When the number of genomic alignments available for a species was small (e.g., for dolphin, only alignments with human and cow were available), we additionally mapped the promoters and enhancers of the species of interest to their orthologous locations in the reference species of its clade (in this case, cow) and tested whether they correspond to marked regions in any other species in the EPO alignment.
Villar D., Berthelot C., Aldridge S., Rayner T.F., Lukk M., Pignatelli M., Park T.J., Deaville R., Erichsen J.T., Jasinska A.J., Turner J.M., Bertelsen M.F., Murchison E.P., Flicek P, & Odom D.T. (2015). Enhancer Evolution across 20 Mammalian Species. Cell, 160(3), 554-566.
Publication 2015
Carnivores Chip seq Dolphin Eutherian mammals Genomic Guinea pig Histone marks Human Macaque Marmoset Mole rat MousePrimates Rabbit Regulatory regions Rodents Tree shrew
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Cancer Research UK, University of Cambridge, European Bioinformatics Institute, University of Illinois Chicago, Zoological Society of London, Cardiff University, University of California, Los Angeles, The Francis Crick Institute, Copenhagen Zoo, Wellcome Trust, Wellcome Sanger Institute
Lineage-specific conservation of regulatory regions (promoters and enhancers) across primates, rodents, ungulates, and carnivores
dependent variables
Identification of lineage-specific promoters and enhancers
Identification of recently evolved promoters and enhancers in reference species (human, mouse, cow, and dog)
control variables
Comparison of ChIP-seq enriched regions between a reference species (human, mouse, cow, and dog) and other species within the same clade using multiple alignment (EPO) or pairwise Lastz alignments
Categorization of lineage-specific and recently evolved elements into promoters and enhancers based on their dominant histone mark enrichment across species within the clade
positive controls
Enriched regions in the reference species that showed functional conservation in any alignable species were used as a comparison for identifying recently evolved promoters and enhancers
negative controls
None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required