Evaluating a Digital Mental Health Intervention for Postpartum Mothers
All mothers deemed eligible to participate will be invited to complete a series of questionnaires via RedCap to assess baseline data of interest before allocation. See Table 2 for specific questionnaires.
Schedule for assessment administration
Study period
TIMEPOINT
Enrolment
Allocation
Intervention
Post-intervention
Follow-up
Weeks 1–8
Week 9
Weeks 9–19v
Weeks 19–21
Weeks 32–34
Adverse Childhood Experiencesa
X
Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional, Second Edition(6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months)b
X
X
X
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Testc
X
X
X
Anxiety Persistence Scalea
X
BEAMd App-Based Questionnairea
X
BEAMd Forum Questionnairea
X
BEAMd Perceived Social Support Questionnairea
X
BEAMd Zoom Telehealth Group Questionnairea
X
Cannabis, Tobacco, and Illicit Drug Usea
X
X
X
Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test – Revisede
X
X
X
Couples Satisfaction Index – 4 Itemf
X
X
X
Depression Persistence Scalea
X
Depressive Symptom Index – Suicidality Subscaleg
X
X
Emergency Health & Social Service Utilizationa
X
X
X
Generalized Anxiety Disorder – 2 Itemh
X
Generalized Anxiety Disorder – 7 Itemi
X
X
X
Infant Behavior Questionnaire – Very Short – Revisedj
X
X
X
mHealth App Usability Questionnairek
X
Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interviewl
X
Mood Mission App-Based Questionnaire
X
Parenting Scale(modified 10 item scale)m
X
X
Parenting Stress Indexn
X
X
X
Parenting Stress Index(modified 4 item scale)a
X
Patient Health Questionnaire – 2 Itemo
X
Patient Health Questionnaire – 9 Itemp
X
X
X
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(Anger and Sleep Disturbance Subscales)q
X
X
X
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory(1–12 or 13–24 months)r,s
Positive and Negative Affect Scale(modified 2-item scale)u
X
Recent Stressful Experiencesa
X
X
X
Sociodemographicsa
X
Substance Use Motives Measure(Coping Motive Subscales)v
X
X
X
Note. aAuthor-Compiled Questionnaire; bSquires et al. (2015)cBabor et al. (2001)dBEAM = Building Emotional Awareness and Mental healtheAdamson & Sellman (2003)fFunk & Rogge (2007) gStanley et al. (2021)hKroenke et al. (2007)ISpitzer et al. (2006) jIBQ-VS-R (Putnam et al., 2014) kZhou et al. (2019) lSheehan et al. (1998) mIrvine et al. 1999 nBarroso et al. (2016) oKroenke et al. (2003) pKroenke et al. (2001) qPROMIS (Hanish et al., 2017; Pilkonis et al., 2011) rPhysical Functioning, Physical Symptoms, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning, and Cognitive Functioning Subscales sVarni et al. (1999) tBarnes & Adamson-Macedo (2007) uWatson et al. (1988) vBiolcati & Passini (2019); vWeekly questionnaires are only administered to those in the BEAM program
Joyce K.M., Rioux C., MacKinnon A.L., Katz L.Y., Reynolds K., Kelly L.E., Klassen T., Afifi T.O., Mushquash A.R., Clement F.M., Chartier M., Xie E.B., Penner K.E., Hunter S., Berard L., Tomfohr-Madsen L, & Roos L.E. (2023). The Building Emotional Awareness and Mental health (BEAM) program developed with a community partner for mothers of infants: protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9, 35.
Publication 2023
AngerAwareness Disorder behavior Emotional Illicit drug Maternal Motive PhysicalSatisfaction Sleep disturbance Social anxiety disorderTelehealth Tobacco
Corresponding Organization : University of Manitoba
Other organizations :
University of Oklahoma, University of Calgary, Lakehead University, University of British Columbia
Positive and Negative Affect Scale (modified 2-item scale)
Recent Stressful Experiences
Sociodemographics
Substance Use Motives Measure (Coping Motive Subscales)
control variables
Control variables not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required