The standard PK-Sim whole-body PBPK structural model for small molecules was utilized to build a combined bedaquiline and M2 model [21 (link)–23 (link)]. The standard PK-Sim whole-body PBPK model consists of key tissues and organs, including, the brain, heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, GI tract, etc., connected through vascular and arterial blood circulation. Each compartment is divided into four subcompartments, i.e., vascular, blood cells, interstitial, and intracellular [22 (link)]. Physicochemical parameters for bedaquiline and M2 were obtained from literature (Table 1) [24 (link)]. Different values have been reported in literature for bedaquiline lipophilicity and fraction unbound; therefore, model evaluation using each of the reported values was conducted to select the lipophilicity and fraction unbound values that provide the best fit to bedaquiline plasma PK data [24 (link), 25 (link)]. Bedaquiline oral absorption has previously been described as atypical with delay and double peaks [26 (link)–28 (link)]. The Weibull absorption model built within the PK-Sim software was selected due to its flexibility in describing atypical absorption profiles, and the parameters were estimated by fitting to the plasma PK data. Partition coefficients and cellular permeability parameters of bedaquiline and M2 in various tissues were calculated using the PK-Sim standard method [22 (link), 29 (link)]. In PK-Sim, the standard calculation method uses lipophilicity and plasma protein binding parameters along with lipid, protein, and water fractions in each compartment and subcompartment to calculate partition coefficients. CYP3A4 enzyme is involved in the metabolism of bedaquiline to M2 [25 (link)]. Therefore, CYP3A4-mediated metabolism conversion from bedaquiline to M2 was modeled using the Michaelis–Menten equation. Experimental data also suggest contributions of CYP2C8 and CYP2C19 enzymes in the metabolism of bedaquiline to M2 [31 (link)] and, thus, were evaluated in the model using the Michaelis–Menten equation. Expression profiles for all three enzymes based on the RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) method were obtained from the Bgee (https://www.bgee.org/) database accessible within PK-Sim [30 (link)]. The parameter Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) for the enzymatic reactions was obtained from literature from in vitro experiments [31 (link)]. Residual bedaquiline liver plasma clearance was obtained from literature [24 (link)]. Next, the model was simultaneously fitted to bedaquiline and M2 PK data following 400–300–200 QD dosing in patients with pulmonary TB to estimate Weibull absorption parameters, enzymatic reaction rates (Vmax), and M2 liver plasma clearance. The combined bedaquiline–M2 plasma PK model was validated by comparing the simulations versus observed plasma PK data for bedaquiline following 200–100 mg QD, 500–400–300 mg QD, and 700–500–400 mg QD dosing regimens (clinical trial: NCT01215110). M2 PK data for this study were not available.
Parameters for the bedaquiline-M2 PBPK model with CNS distribution
Permeability across BBB and BCSFB (assumed half of the calculated permeability from plasma-to-interstitial due to lipid bilayer in BBB and BCSFB)
dm/min
0.185
PK-Sim Calculated
Cellular permeability from plasma to interstitial
dm/min
0.36
Brain interstitial water partition coefficient
Dimensionless
0.0013
Brain intracellular water partition coefficient
Dimensionless
2.8 × 10−6
Plasma-to-CSF partition coefficient
Dimensionless
0.0084
Eq. 1
aWater solubility was assumed 0.01 mg/mL because both bedaquiline and M2 are poorly soluble in water
bBedaquiline number of halogens Cl is 2, thus, effective molecular weight is 511.5 g/mol
cM2 number of halogens Cl is 2, thus, effective molecular weight is 497 g/mol
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Mehta K., Balazki P., van der Graaf P.H., Guo T, & van Hasselt J.G. (2024). Predictions of Bedaquiline Central Nervous System Exposure in Patients with Tuberculosis Meningitis Using Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Modeling. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 63(5), 657-668.
Publication 2024
Corresponding Organization : Centre for Human Drug Research
Bedaquiline and M2 model parameters (e.g., lipophilicity, fraction unbound, Weibull absorption parameters, enzymatic reaction rates, liver clearance)
dependent variables
Bedaquiline and M2 plasma pharmacokinetics
control variables
Physicochemical parameters for bedaquiline and M2 obtained from literature
Tissue-specific partition coefficients and permeability parameters calculated using the PK-Sim standard method
CYP3A4, CYP2C8, and CYP2C19 enzyme expression profiles obtained from the Bgee database
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required