QC process including trimming of low-quality bases, masking of human DNA contamination, and removal of duplicated reads were performed by using kneaddata (version v0.6.1). Human DNA contamination was identified by aligning all raw reads to the human reference genome (hg19) using bowtie2 (version 2.3.5.1). Taxonomic annotation of metagenome and the abundance quantification were performed by MetaPhlAn (version 2.0). Relative abundance of each clade was calculated at six levels (L2: phylum, L3: class, L4: order, L5: family, L6: genus, L7: species). Functional annotations were performed by using the data files from the HMP Unified Metabolic Analysis Network 3.0 (HUMAnN 3.0)74 (link). The clean paired-end sequencing data were merged into a single fastq file. The HUMAnN 3.0 toolkit was run by using the “humann–input myseq*.fq–output humann3/–threads 32–memory-use maximum -r -v” command, which calls Bowtie275 (link) to compare nucleic acid sequence and calls DIAMOND76 (link) to compare protein sequences to complete gene and protein function annotation to obtain KEGG pathway annotation. Differences in bacterial abundance and functional pathway were analyzed using MaAslin277 (link). Richness indices were calculated using the R Community Ecology Package vegan. Weighted Unifrac distance was calculated using Metaphlan3 R script “Unifrac_distance.r” and root-tree file “mpa_v30_CHOCOPhlAn_201901_species_tree.nwk”. The PCoA results were calculated and visualized using R build-in functions and the plot3D R package. The ANOSIM test was used to calculate the significance of dissimilarity using the R Community Ecology Package vegan. Pearson correlation and P values were evaluated using the rcorr function in the Hmisc R package.
Metagenomic Profiling of Microbial Communities
QC process including trimming of low-quality bases, masking of human DNA contamination, and removal of duplicated reads were performed by using kneaddata (version v0.6.1). Human DNA contamination was identified by aligning all raw reads to the human reference genome (hg19) using bowtie2 (version 2.3.5.1). Taxonomic annotation of metagenome and the abundance quantification were performed by MetaPhlAn (version 2.0). Relative abundance of each clade was calculated at six levels (L2: phylum, L3: class, L4: order, L5: family, L6: genus, L7: species). Functional annotations were performed by using the data files from the HMP Unified Metabolic Analysis Network 3.0 (HUMAnN 3.0)74 (link). The clean paired-end sequencing data were merged into a single fastq file. The HUMAnN 3.0 toolkit was run by using the “humann–input myseq*.fq–output humann3/–threads 32–memory-use maximum -r -v” command, which calls Bowtie275 (link) to compare nucleic acid sequence and calls DIAMOND76 (link) to compare protein sequences to complete gene and protein function annotation to obtain KEGG pathway annotation. Differences in bacterial abundance and functional pathway were analyzed using MaAslin277 (link). Richness indices were calculated using the R Community Ecology Package vegan. Weighted Unifrac distance was calculated using Metaphlan3 R script “Unifrac_distance.r” and root-tree file “mpa_v30_CHOCOPhlAn_201901_species_tree.nwk”. The PCoA results were calculated and visualized using R build-in functions and the plot3D R package. The ANOSIM test was used to calculate the significance of dissimilarity using the R Community Ecology Package vegan. Pearson correlation and P values were evaluated using the rcorr function in the Hmisc R package.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, First People's Hospital of Foshan
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Relative abundance of each clade at six levels (L2: phylum, L3: class, L4: order, L5: family, L6: genus, L7: species)
- Differences in bacterial abundance and functional pathway
- None explicitly mentioned
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the protocol.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!