The samples were fixed in 7% formaldehyde for 5 days, after which the samples were oriented and placed in cassettes. Tissue processing was performed using a vacuum infiltration processor, Tissue-Tek VIP 5 Jr (Sakura, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands). Paraffin embedding and sectioning were performed using the Tissue-Tek TEC 6 system (Sakura, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands) and Accu-Cut SRM 200 Rotary Microtome (Sakura, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands). Slide staining was performed using the automated slide stainer Tissue-Tek Prisma Plus (Sakura, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands), according to the internal staining protocol, using Mayer Modified Hematoxylin (Titolchimica, Rovigo, Italy) and Eosine solution (10 g Eosine B in 1000 mL distilled water). Immunohistochemistry was performed automatically on 3 μm thick sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues with MD Stainer (Vitro Master Diagnostica®, Granada, Spain) using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), at pH = 9, for antigen retrieval. We used anti-SARS coronavirus NP mouse anti-virus antibody (clone B46F, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) at a 1:100 dilution for the immunohistochemical assessment. Positive cells are colored in brown. Microscopic examination was performed by the same experienced pathologist (D.G.), using a Leica DM1000 clinical microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a dedicated image acquisition camera and software. All sections were examined by the same experienced investigator (D.G.).
Presence/absence of SARS coronavirus NP (nucleoprotein)
dependent variables
Immunohistochemical staining intensity (positive cells are colored in brown)
control variables
Tissue fixation in 7% formaldehyde for 5 days
Tissue orientation and placement in cassettes
Tissue processing using a vacuum infiltration processor
Paraffin embedding and sectioning using the Tissue-Tek TEC 6 system and Accu-Cut SRM 200 Rotary Microtome
Slide staining using the automated slide stainer Tissue-Tek Prisma Plus, Mayer Modified Hematoxylin, and Eosine solution
Immunohistochemistry performed automatically on 3 μm thick sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues with MD Stainer using EDTA at pH = 9 for antigen retrieval
Microscopic examination performed by the same experienced pathologist (D.G.) using a Leica DM1000 clinical microscope
positive controls
No positive control was explicitly mentioned
negative controls
No negative control was explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required