Since blood is a mixture of functionally and developmentally distinct cell populations,45 (link) adjusting cell-type compositions was needed in analyses to reduce confounding from cell heterogeneity in DNAm measured from blood samples.46 (link) We estimated cell-type proportions using the method proposed by Jaffe and Irizarry,47 (link) adapted from Houseman et al,48 (link) using the Bioconductor minfi package.49 (link) The estimated cell-type proportions of CD4+ T cells, natural killer cells, neutrophil, B cells, monocytes and eosinophil cells were included in the analyses as confounding factors.
DNA Methylation Profiling in Blood Samples
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of Memphis
Other organizations : University of Southampton, Michigan State University, National Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol, King's College London, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- DNA methylation (DNAm) measured in peripheral blood
- Cell-type proportions of CD4+ T cells, natural killer cells, neutrophil, B cells, monocytes and eosinophil cells
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the provided information.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!