The area of corneal neovascularization was quantified by photographic documentation every 3 days for a total duration of 9 days. Three mice of each group were sacrificed on days 3, 6, and 9 after corneal injury for immunohistochemistry. Corneas from ten mice of each group were procured on days 5, 8, and 14 after alkali treatment for western blot analysis. On day 9 after alkali treatment, corneas from the remaining mice were procured for real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR) analysis.
Corneal Neovascularization Induction and Analysis
The area of corneal neovascularization was quantified by photographic documentation every 3 days for a total duration of 9 days. Three mice of each group were sacrificed on days 3, 6, and 9 after corneal injury for immunohistochemistry. Corneas from ten mice of each group were procured on days 5, 8, and 14 after alkali treatment for western blot analysis. On day 9 after alkali treatment, corneas from the remaining mice were procured for real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR) analysis.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Sun Yat-sen University
Protocol cited in 4 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Time after subconjunctival injection (5 days)
- Alkali burn on cornea (0.1 M NaOH for 30 s)
- Corneal neovascularization (quantified by photographic documentation every 3 days for 9 days)
- Immunohistochemistry (on days 3, 6, and 9 after corneal injury)
- Western blot analysis (on days 5, 8, and 14 after alkali treatment)
- Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR) analysis (on day 9 after alkali treatment)
- General anesthesia (xylazine hydrochloride and ketamine hydrochloride)
- Topical anesthesia (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride)
- Irrigation with normal saline (60 ml) after alkali treatment
- Scraping of corneal and limbal epithelia with a surgical blade
- Administration of erythromycin ophthalmic ointment after epithelial denudation
- Positive control: Not specified
- Negative control: Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!