This study was based on the GBD database and does not contain identifiable personal information. Therefore, a waiver of informed consent was reviewed and approved by the University of Washington institutional review board. Both sexes were included, and race/ethnicity was not reported. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (
Work-Environment Carcinogens and Cancer Burden
This study was based on the GBD database and does not contain identifiable personal information. Therefore, a waiver of informed consent was reviewed and approved by the University of Washington institutional review board. Both sexes were included, and race/ethnicity was not reported. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (
Corresponding Organization : Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Other organizations : Florida State University, New York University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard University
Protocol cited in 3 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Exposure to arsenic
- Exposure to asbestos
- Exposure to beryllium
- Exposure to cadmium
- Exposure to chromium
- Exposure to diesel engine exhaust
- Exposure to nickel
- Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- Exposure to silica
- Exposure to benzene
- Exposure to formaldehyde
- Exposure to sulfuric acid
- Exposure to trichloroethylene
- Tracheal, bronchial, and lung cancer
- Leukemia
- Larynx cancer
- Mesothelioma
- Nasopharynx cancer
- Ovarian cancer
- Kidney cancer
- OC-attributable cancer deaths
- OC-attributable DALYs
- Age-standardized rates of OC-attributable cancer deaths and DALYs
- Summary exposure value of each OC from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2017
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!