Whole-mount immunofluorescence of seminiferous tubules was performed as described (Carrieri et al., 2017 (link)). For the expression analysis of TAG-NANOS2 and GFRα1, co-staining of tubules was done with two primary antibodies: α-GFP, 1:500 (GFP-1010, Aves), α-GFRα1, 1:50 (GT15004, Neuromics). For the expression analysis of TAG-NANOS2 and c-KIT, co-staining was done with: α-GFP, 1:200 (A-11122, ThermoFisher) and α-C-kit, 1:250 (AF1356-SP, R&D Systems). For the expression analysis of TAG-NANOS2 and PLZF: α-GFP, 1:500 (GFP-1010, Aves), α-PLZF, 1:100 (sc22839, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For the expression analysis of TAG-NANOS2 and Dcp1a: α-GFP, 1:500 (GFP-1010, Aves), α-Dcp1a 1:500 (WH0055802M6, Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary antibodies used were all Invitrogen: goat anti-Chicken, Alexa Fluor 488 (A-11039); donkey anti-Rabbit, Alexa Fluor 488 (A-21206); donkey anti-goat, Alexa Fluor 568 (A-11057). Images were acquired by using a Confocal microscope, by taking Z-stacks, and with Z-stepsize set at 0.34 μm. Images were analyzed with Fiji ImageJ. As and Apr spermatogonia were distinguished by using the 25 μm topographical criteria (Huckins, 1971 (link)). If the internuclear distance between two spermatogonia was over 25 μm, cells were assigned to the As category. On the contrary, spermatogonia whose internuclear distance was smaller than 25 μm, were considered to belong to the same chain.
Free full text: Click here