All investigations involving human subjects were performed after approval by an institutional review board and in accordance with the principles of ethical research guidelines described in the U.S. Common Rule. Informed written consent was obtained from each subject. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Institutional Review Board (IRB) determined that this research met the criteria for exemption from IRB review and was categorized as Secondary Use research. The GeM Consortium is composed of investigators from academic centers and hospitals (“member sites”) with eligible subjects and existing tissue banking protocols with consent for biospecimen and clinical data collection; genetic testing, including but not limited to whole-genome/exome sequencing; sharing of specimens/data with outside institutions, researchers, etc. The GeM coordinating center at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) coordinated sharing of retrospectively collected specimens from existing tumor banks and pathology archives at member sites to perform molecular characterization of MPNST and related tumors. All specimens and data were stripped of Protected Health Information using the Safe Harbor Method and coded. The prefix of each tumor sample ID included in the final cohort in Fig. 1 (n = 95) is an abbreviation of the member site that contributed the required specimens for analysis: Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital at University College, London (“ROY,” n = 43), Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa (“MOF,” n = 12), Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (“TOR,” n = 9), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (“MGH,” n = 8), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (“WUS,” n = 6), Nagoya University, Nagoya (“NAG,” n = 4), Boston Children's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (“BCH,” n = 3), New York University Langone Medical Center, New York (“NYU,” n = 3), Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah, Salt Lake City (“HCI,” n = 1), Lifespan Laboratories, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence (“LIF,” n = 1). The coordinating center at BCH received coded material from the following types of biospecimens: MPNSTs (both sporadic and NF1-related); precursor and other lesions, such as benign, atypical, and PN; metastatic and local recurrence neurofibroma; related specimens such as peripheral blood or tissue for germline comparison, and normal nerve where available. Subjects with tumors that were unrelated to MPNST or neurofibroma and subjects with specimens of insufficient quality and/or quality for pathology interpretation were excluded from this study. Comprehensive clinical and pathology report data for each participant were collected by the international MPNST Registry at Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM). Data include demographic information, disease course, tumor size/anatomic location, histologic/immuno-histochemical characteristics, diagnostic imaging, surgical procedures, systemic treatment information, neoadjuvant therapy, toxicity, clinical outcomes, and survival.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Cortes-Ciriano I., Steele C.D., Piculell K., Al-Ibraheemi A., Eulo V., Bui M.M., Chatzipli A., Dickson B.C., Borcherding D.C., Feber A., Galor A., Hart J., Jones K.B., Jordan J.T., Kim R.H., Lindsay D., Miller C., Nishida Y., Proszek P.Z., Serrano J., Sundby R.T., Szymanski J.J., Ullrich N.J., Viskochil D., Wang X., Snuderl M., Park P.J., Flanagan A.M., Hirbe A.C., Pillay N, & Miller D.T. (2023). Genomic Patterns of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) Evolution Correlate with Clinical Outcome and Are Detectable in Cell-Free DNA. Cancer Discovery, 13(3), 654-671.
Corresponding Organization : Boston Children's Hospital
Other organizations :
European Bioinformatics Institute, London Cancer, University College London, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Moffitt Cancer Center, Harvard University, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Research, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Lifespan, Rhode Island Hospital, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Sinai Health System, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Hospital for Sick Children, SickKids Foundation, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Nagoya University Hospital, NYU Langone Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Center for Cancer Research
All investigations involving human subjects were performed after approval by an institutional review board and in accordance with the principles of ethical research guidelines described in the U.S. Common Rule.
Informed written consent was obtained from each subject.
The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Institutional Review Board (IRB) determined that this research met the criteria for exemption from IRB review and was categorized as Secondary Use research.
All specimens and data were stripped of Protected Health Information using the Safe Harbor Method and coded.
Subjects with tumors that were unrelated to MPNST or neurofibroma and subjects with specimens of insufficient quality and/or quality for pathology interpretation were excluded from this study.
positive controls
Not specified.
negative controls
Not specified.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required