We log-transformed analyte concentrations due to their right-skewed distributions; only BPA sulfate and Total BPA levels were approximately normal after transformation and therefore we used non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman’s, Wilcoxon signed rank) for univariate analyses. To compare concentrations of analytes within samples, we defined three groups based on the dominant analyte in the sample, compared levels of Total BPA between these groups and, using Pearson’s χ2 test, evaluated the association between these groups and having Total BPA levels above the median. Sex differences in BPA metabolic pathways have been reported in the literature on adult humans; therefore we examined sex differences in analyte levels and in dominant BPA analyte using Fisher’s Exact test. Lastly, we evaluated the association between gestational age and analyte levels through correlation and regression models, adjusting for sex. Due to the frequencies of non-detect BPA and BPA glucuronide, for these outcomes we used tobit regression [50 -51 ], which treats
Prenatal BPA Exposure Metabolomics Analysis
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of California, San Francisco, Washington State University
Protocol cited in 9 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Gestational age
- Concentrations of BPA, BPA glucuronide, and BPA sulfate
- Total BPA
- Percent of Total BPA in original, glucuronide, and sulfate form
- The study does not explicitly mention any positive or negative controls.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!