The elastic modulus (Young's modulus), E, of the gels was evaluated by applying a known hydrodynamic shear stress, τ, to the gel surface using a custom-built microfluidic device, measuring the resulting bead displacement, , calculating the shear of the gel, , and applying the equation , where ν is the Poisson ratio, as explained in detail elsewhere [26] . Because the Poisson ratio of silicone gels is nearly equal to 0.5 [27] , the equation was reduced to . To measure the gel thickness, , a small amount of the 40 nm far-red fluorescent beads was deposited on the cover glass surface before it was coated with the gel pre-polymer. The fluorescence microscope was first focused on beads on the glass surface and then on those on the gel surface and the difference in the readings of the nosepiece (z-axis) knob was recorded (with a correction for the mismatch between the refractive indices of the gel and immersion liquid), resulting in ∼1 µm accuracy. The shear, , was found to be a zero-crossing linear function of τ for of up to at least 3 µm (greater than produced by HUVECs; see below) for all gels, with no sign of plastic deformations (see also [26] ), thus validating the use of the equation , which applies to linear materials. Furthermore, measurements of vs. at different constant values of τ resulted in linear dependencies, indicating homogeneity of mechanical properties of the gel layers.
Silicone Gel Substrate Preparation
The elastic modulus (Young's modulus), E, of the gels was evaluated by applying a known hydrodynamic shear stress, τ, to the gel surface using a custom-built microfluidic device, measuring the resulting bead displacement, , calculating the shear of the gel, , and applying the equation , where ν is the Poisson ratio, as explained in detail elsewhere [26] . Because the Poisson ratio of silicone gels is nearly equal to 0.5 [27] , the equation was reduced to . To measure the gel thickness, , a small amount of the 40 nm far-red fluorescent beads was deposited on the cover glass surface before it was coated with the gel pre-polymer. The fluorescence microscope was first focused on beads on the glass surface and then on those on the gel surface and the difference in the readings of the nosepiece (z-axis) knob was recorded (with a correction for the mismatch between the refractive indices of the gel and immersion liquid), resulting in ∼1 µm accuracy. The shear, , was found to be a zero-crossing linear function of τ for of up to at least 3 µm (greater than produced by HUVECs; see below) for all gels, with no sign of plastic deformations (see also [26] ), thus validating the use of the equation , which applies to linear materials. Furthermore, measurements of vs. at different constant values of τ resulted in linear dependencies, indicating homogeneity of mechanical properties of the gel layers.
Corresponding Organization : La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Protocol cited in 8 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Proportions of the components of HRI gel pre-polymers, parts A and B of QGel 920 and parts A and B of QGel 903
- Thickness of the cured gel layer on the cover glasses
- Elastic modulus (Young's modulus, E) of the gels
- Shear of the gel (γ)
- Spin-coating speed (1920 rpm)
- Baking temperature (100°C) and duration (2 hr)
- Concentration of carboxylated far-red fluorescent beads (40 nm, 100 µg/ml)
- Concentration of 1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC, 100 µg/ml)
- Concentration of fibronectin (FN, 50 µg/ml)
- Poisson ratio of silicone gels (nearly 0.5)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!