Similar to the ABCD data, we extracted the timeseries from a total of 394 cortical and subcortical ROIs, correlated and Fisher z-transformed them. Data from the NIH Toolbox were correlated with each edge of the RSFC correlation matrix across participants. Across all NIH Toolbox subscales, the tails of the distributions of the resulting brain–behavioural phenotype correlations were compared to 100 subsampled ABCD brain–behavioural phenotype correlations (n = 877, matching HCP sample size). In
Exploring Brain-Behavioral Phenotypes across Datasets
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Harvard University
Other organizations : University of Pittsburgh, University of Minnesota, Oregon Health & Science University, National University of Singapore, University of California, San Diego, University of Vermont, University of Oxford, University of Minnesota Medical Center
Protocol cited in 2 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Data from n = 900 individuals from the HCP 1,200 Subject Data Release (aged 22-35 years)
- High-resolution T1-weighted (MP-RAGE, TR = 2.4 s, 0.7 mm^3 voxels) and BOLD contrast sensitive (gradient-echo EPI, multiband factor 8, TR = 0.72 s, 2 mm^3 voxels) images from each participant
- Timeseries from a total of 394 cortical and subcortical ROIs
- Correlated and Fisher z-transformed RSFC correlation matrix
- Brain-behavioural phenotype correlations for each NIH Toolbox subscale
- All HCP participants provided informed consent
- Siemens SKYRA 3.0T MRI scanner and a custom 32-channel head matrix coil were used
- MRI data were preprocessed as previously described
- Data from the NIH Toolbox were correlated with each edge of the RSFC correlation matrix across participants
- Distributions of brain-behavioural phenotype correlations for ABCD and HCP data were compared for each NIH Toolbox subscale
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!