Efficacy of Staatl. Fachingen Still in Heartburn Treatment
This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with parallel-group design was conducted from April 2019 to June 2021 in 12 study sites in Germany in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (version 2013) and the requirements of the German Medicinal Products Act. The trial was planned with an adaptive design in two stages to determine the superiority of Staatl. Fachingen Still (verum) over placebo in terms of efficacy for the treatment of heartburn. Placebo was a conventional mineral water with far lower mineralisation than verum. Verum and placebo were visually similar and packed in identical bottles with the same label. Furthermore, both study drugs had a comparable low content of carbonic acid (for composition of study drugs, see online supplemental methods). After screening, the patients went through a run-in phase during which they were advised to drink at least 1.5 L/day of water or other beverages. Only patients with an intake of at least 1.5 L/day of liquids on at least 10 days prior to baseline and with a Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score ≥8 in the dimension ‘heartburn’ considering the last 7 days prior to baseline were eligible for randomisation. Patients were centrally allocated to the lowest yet unassigned random number in a blinded fashion to either the verum or placebo group (ratio 1:1, block randomisation with block size n=4). During the treatment period, each patient received for 42 days (6 weeks) either 1.5 L/day of verum or 1.5 L/day of placebo, both to be drunk over the course of the day. The volume of intake was documented in a diary and controlled by the number of empty/full bottles returned. Rescue medication was provided within the clinical trial (Rennie Kautabletten—calcium carbonate/magnesium carbonate); intake was allowed in case the patient considered the heartburn episode as not tolerable and had to be documented. Patients were advised not to change their general eating habits during the trial. Patients, investigators and trial staff remained blinded for the entirety of the trial duration and data analysis. The trial is registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT no. 2017-001100-30) and the German Registry of Clinical Studies (DRKS00016696).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Labenz J., Anschütz M., Walstab J., Wedemeyer R.S., Wolters H, & Schug B. (2023). Heartburn relief with bicarbonate-rich mineral water: results of the randomised, placebo-controlled phase-III trial STOMACH STILL. BMJ Open Gastroenterology, 10(1), e001048.
Placebo (conventional mineral water with lower mineralization)
dependent variables
Efficacy for the treatment of heartburn
control variables
Visual similarity of verum and placebo
Identical packaging and labeling of verum and placebo
Comparable low content of carbonic acid in verum and placebo
Patients' general eating habits during the trial
Patients, investigators and trial staff remained blinded for the entirety of the trial duration and data analysis
positive control
Rennie Kautabletten (calcium carbonate/magnesium carbonate) as rescue medication
negative control
Placebo (conventional mineral water with lower mineralization)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required