The PERCH case definition (Table 2) was based on the 2005 World Health Organization (WHO) clinical definition of severe and very severe pneumonia [8 (link)]. The definition relies on the presence of prespecified clinical signs, without information from chest radiograph (CXR) or pulse oximetry. The PERCH enrollment period predated the 2013 reclassification of severe and very severe pneumonia by the WHO [12 ]. Through a series of teleconferences and 2 face-to-face meetings between all PERCH principal investigators (PIs), consensus was achieved on how to elicit, recognize, and interpret each of the signs and symptoms comprising the PERCH clinical case definition (Table 2), and on the choice of methods and equipment for obtaining key clinical measurements (pulse oximetry, anthropometry, respiratory rate) and clinical samples (nasopharyngeal [NP] and oropharyngeal [OP] swabs, induced sputum [IS], lung aspirates, blood, urine). Training materials and advice were sought from a wide variety of sources (see Acknowledgments). Many of the clinical video clips, audio recordings and photographs were recorded at PERCH sites by the principal trainer (J. C.), with written informed consent from the patient’s parents or guardians.
Crawley J., Prosperi C., Baggett H.C., Brooks W.A., Deloria Knoll M., Hammitt L.L., Howie S.R., Kotloff K.L., Levine O.S., Madhi S.A., Murdoch D.R., O’Brien K.L., Thea D.M., Awori J.O., Bunthi C., DeLuca A.N., Driscoll A.J., Ebruke B.E., Goswami D., Hidgon M.M., Karron R.A., Kazungu S., Kourouma N., Mackenzie G., Moore D.P., Mudau A., Mwale M., Nahar K., Park D.E., Piralam B., Seidenberg P., Sylla M., Feikin D.R, & Scott J.A. (2017). Standardization of Clinical Assessment and Sample Collection Across All PERCH Study Sites. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 64(Suppl 3), S228-S237.
Other organizations :
University of Oxford, Johns Hopkins University, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Public Health, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, University of Auckland, University of Otago, MRC Unit the Gambia, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Medical Research Council, National Research Foundation, University of the Witwatersrand, Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Boston University, Centre Pour le Développement des Vaccins-Mali, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital, University Teaching Hospital, Milken Institute, George Washington University, Nakhon Phanom University, University of New Mexico, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
Choice of methods and equipment for obtaining key clinical measurements (pulse oximetry, anthropometry, respiratory rate) and clinical samples (nasopharyngeal [NP] and oropharyngeal [OP] swabs, induced sputum [IS], lung aspirates, blood, urine)
dependent variables
Presence of prespecified clinical signs
control variables
Chest radiograph (CXR) or pulse oximetry
controls
Positive control: Not specified
Negative control: Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required