Cataract surgeries were performed by 19 experienced cataract surgeons using the same standard technique of sutureless microincision phacoemulsification and the same protocol. The surgical procedures consisted of topical anaesthesia, the creation of a scleral or corneal incision of 1.8 to 2.8 mm, 5 mm of continuous capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification cataract extraction and IOL implantation with an injector.
Monofocal vs. Multifocal IOLs in Cataract Surgery
Cataract surgeries were performed by 19 experienced cataract surgeons using the same standard technique of sutureless microincision phacoemulsification and the same protocol. The surgical procedures consisted of topical anaesthesia, the creation of a scleral or corneal incision of 1.8 to 2.8 mm, 5 mm of continuous capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification cataract extraction and IOL implantation with an injector.
Protocol cited in 3 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Lens type (monofocal vs. multifocal)
- Spherical aberrations
- Contrast sensitivity under mesopic conditions after cataract surgery
- Cataract surgery technique (sutureless microincision phacoemulsification)
- Surgical protocol (topical anaesthesia, 1.8 to 2.8 mm incision, 5 mm continuous capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification cataract extraction, IOL implantation with an injector)
- Lens design (aspherical, modified prolate anterior surface to minimize spherical aberrations and improve contrast sensitivity under mesopic conditions)
- Lens diameter (6.0 mm)
- Surgeons (19 experienced cataract surgeons)
- Positive control: Tecnis monofocal IOLs (ZCB00) implanted bilaterally in the monofocal group
- Positive control: Tecnis multifocal IOLs (ZMB00) implanted bilaterally in the multifocal group
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!