Trachoma mapping is the mandate of ministries of health, who consider it part of routine surveillance activities rather than a research activity. For this reason, and because in the largely non-literate rural populations among whom these surveys are conducted, verbal consent is generally more acceptable than written consent, we request informed verbal consent for eye examination from each resident, or in the case of minors, from their parent or legal guardian. Consent is documented in the LINKS application. Examination for TT is benign. Eversion of the tarsal conjunctivae to allow examination for TF and TI causes only minimal transient discomfort. Following WHO recommendations,26 young children are held by their mother or a community assistant to ensure that they are able to keep still during the examination. This prevents accidental injury to the eye and ensures the process is as quick and as minimally distressing as possible. TF is generally most common in pre-school-age children, while the prevalence of TT increases with age. Therefore, it is particularly important to ensure that young children and the elderly are proportionately represented in returned survey data. Because people with disabilities or mental health issues are more likely than others to be socioeconomically disadvantaged, and trachoma is associated with poverty,27 (link) we try to ensure that such individuals are not excluded from participating. The project was approved by the ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (reference number 6319), and the appropriate local ethics committee identified by each ministry of health. The work conforms to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Solomon A.W., Pavluck A.L., Courtright P., Aboe A., Adamu L., Alemayehu W., Alemu M., Alexander N.D., Kello A.B., Bero B., Brooker S.J., Chu B.K., Dejene M., Emerson P.M., Flueckiger R.M., Gadisa S., Gass K., Gebre T., Habtamu Z., Harvey E., Haslam D., King J.D., Mesurier R.L., Lewallen S., Lietman T.M., MacArthur C., Mariotti S.P., Massey A., Mathieu E., Mekasha A., Millar T., Mpyet C., Muñoz B.E., Ngondi J., Ogden S., Pearce J., Sarah V., Sisay A., Smith J.L., Taylor H.R., Thomson J., West S.K., Willis R., Bush S., Haddad D, & Foster A. (2015). The Global Trachoma Mapping Project: Methodology of a 34-Country Population-Based Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 22(3), 214-225.
Publication 2015
Accidental Accidental injury Children Conjunctivae Elderly Ethics committee Held Injury eye Legal guardian Local ethics committeeMental health MotherParent People with disabilities Pre school Rural populationsTrachoma Transient
Corresponding Organization : London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Other organizations :
The Task Force for Global Health, International Trachoma Initiative, University of Cape Town, Ethiopian Public Health Association, International Trachoma Initiative, Carter Center, Oromiyaa Regional Health Bureau, WaterAid, Sightsavers, San Francisco Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, Helen Keller International, World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, University of Jos, Johns Hopkins University, University of Melbourne, Emory Eye Center
Age (to ensure young children and the elderly are proportionately represented)
Disability or mental health status (to ensure such individuals are not excluded)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required