Mixed-Methods Study on End-of-Life in Nursing Homes
This study was part of a larger mixed-methods project on the final year of life in NHs [31 ]. The research team included members with varied expertise of each the substantive and methodological areas (see Table 3 for details). The senior author, who has extensive expertise with the A-PM, oversaw all data collection and analysis and provided A-PM training to the team members. To prepare for data analysis, the team coded the same case and resolved discrepancies through discussion. Nearly all members of the research team had direct experience with NHs either through work, volunteer, training, or personal circumstances.
Gruneir A., Hoben M., Easterbrook A., Jensen C., Buencamino M., Tompalski J., Chamberlain S.A., Ekhlas S., Bever G., Murphy R., Estabrooks C.A., Keefe J, & Marshall S. (2023). Exploring nursing home resident and their care partner priorities for care using the Action-Project Method. BMC Geriatrics, 23, 133.
Corresponding Organization : University of Alberta
Other organizations :
St. Paul's Hospital, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Carleton University, University of Calgary, University of British Columbia, Mount Saint Vincent University
No positive or negative controls specified by the authors.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required