The proportion (and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) of the study participants who either agreed or strongly agreed that they were “ok with being asked,” during their hospital visit, about their behavior with respect to the risk factors was estimated to assess the acceptability outcome. The data collected on the various effectiveness outcomes were analyzed: the proportion (95% CI) of study participants were calculated for each effectiveness outcome. A chi-squared test was used to assess whether the proportion of participants with medium or high risk on at least one risk factor was statistically different (α < 0.05) between the baseline and the follow-up. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.
Assessing Modifiable Risk Factors
The proportion (and 95% confidence intervals (CI)) of the study participants who either agreed or strongly agreed that they were “ok with being asked,” during their hospital visit, about their behavior with respect to the risk factors was estimated to assess the acceptability outcome. The data collected on the various effectiveness outcomes were analyzed: the proportion (95% CI) of study participants were calculated for each effectiveness outcome. A chi-squared test was used to assess whether the proportion of participants with medium or high risk on at least one risk factor was statistically different (α < 0.05) between the baseline and the follow-up. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Alberta Health Services
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Proportion of patients who screened medium or high risk on modifiable risk factors
- Proportion of patients who screened medium or high risk on modifiable risk factors and received brief advice
- Proportion of patients found to be high risk at screening who then received referral support
- Proportion of study participants who either agreed or strongly agreed that they were 'ok with being asked' during their hospital visit about their behavior with respect to the risk factors
- Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants (age, gender, education status)
- None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!