For DECT, the readers had access to 120 kV-equivalent and VNCa images and were allowed to freely adjust the window levelling and to invert the images. For MRI, T1-weighted and STIR images were scored. Only images of the sacroiliac joints were shown, while spinal images were not included in the image stack. The two readers used an established 24-region scoring model of the SIJs, which divides each joint into 4 anterior, 4 middle, and 4 posterior quadrants [6 (link)]. Bone marrow oedema and fatty bone marrow deposition were scored as followed: 0: absent; 1: <33% of the quadrant, 33–66% of the quadrant; ≥66% of the quadrant. On VNCa images, osteitis was defined as a hyperdense subchondral lesion of the bone marrow adjacent to the cartilaginous joint surface. In contrast, fat lesions were defined as hypodense compared with normal bone marrow attenuation. Sclerosis was assessed on a three-point scale: 0: no sclerosis; 1: possible/little sclerosis; 2: marked sclerosis. Disagreements between the two readers were solved by two different experts: an expert with 7 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging solved disagreements in the interpretation of DECT images and another expert with 18 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging disagreements in MRI interpretation.
Scoring Sacroiliac Joint Imaging
For DECT, the readers had access to 120 kV-equivalent and VNCa images and were allowed to freely adjust the window levelling and to invert the images. For MRI, T1-weighted and STIR images were scored. Only images of the sacroiliac joints were shown, while spinal images were not included in the image stack. The two readers used an established 24-region scoring model of the SIJs, which divides each joint into 4 anterior, 4 middle, and 4 posterior quadrants [6 (link)]. Bone marrow oedema and fatty bone marrow deposition were scored as followed: 0: absent; 1: <33% of the quadrant, 33–66% of the quadrant; ≥66% of the quadrant. On VNCa images, osteitis was defined as a hyperdense subchondral lesion of the bone marrow adjacent to the cartilaginous joint surface. In contrast, fat lesions were defined as hypodense compared with normal bone marrow attenuation. Sclerosis was assessed on a three-point scale: 0: no sclerosis; 1: possible/little sclerosis; 2: marked sclerosis. Disagreements between the two readers were solved by two different experts: an expert with 7 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging solved disagreements in the interpretation of DECT images and another expert with 18 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging disagreements in MRI interpretation.
Corresponding Organization : Freie Universität Berlin
Other organizations : Klinikum rechts der Isar
Variable analysis
- Imaging modality (MRI and DECT)
- Bone marrow edema score (0: absent, 1: <33%, 2: 33-66%, 3: ≥66% of the quadrant)
- Fatty bone marrow deposition score (0: absent, 1: <33%, 2: 33-66%, 3: ≥66% of the quadrant)
- Osteitis score (0: absent, 1: present) on VNCa images
- Fat lesion score (0: absent, 1: present) on VNCa images
- Sclerosis score (0: no sclerosis, 1: possible/little sclerosis, 2: marked sclerosis)
- Readers (reader 1 and reader 2)
- Expertise of readers (reader 1: musculoskeletal radiologist with 13 years of experience, reader 2: research student with 3 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging)
- Blinding of readers to identifying information and the images and results of the other imaging modality
- Focused on images of the sacroiliac joints, excluding spinal images
- Established 24-region scoring model of the sacroiliac joints
- Disagreements between the two readers were solved by experts (7 years and 18 years of experience in musculoskeletal imaging)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!