CR2032-type coin cells were assembled to deposit Li on the current collectors to evaluate the Coulombic efficiency, electrochemical impedance spectra and other properties. The cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box. The coin cell was composed of a Li foil as the counter/reference electrode, a Celgard separator, and a current collector as the working electrode. The electrolyte was 1 M LiTFSI in DOL/DME (1:1 by volume, 30 μl, BASF) without any additives unless noted otherwise. The Coulombic efficiency was tested at 0.5 mA cm−2 on a LAND electrochemical testing system at room temperature. The batteries were first cycled at 0–1 V (versus Li+/Li) at 50 μA for five cycles to stabilize the SEI and remove surface contaminations. After that, 1 mA h cm−2 of Li was deposited onto the current collector and then charged to 0.5 V (versus Li+/Li) to strip the Li at 0.5 mA cm−2 for each cycle. The Coulombic efficiency was calculated based on the ratio of Li stripping and plating. Electrochemical impedance spectra measurement was performed using an Autolab workstation (Metrohm) in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 100 mHz after specific cycles. Symmetric cells were employed to evaluate the cycling stability and cycle life (short-circuit time Tsc) of the Li anodes on different current collectors. The symmetric cell was assembled using a hollow spacer substituting for the Celgard separator in a CR2032-type coin cell, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 11. The electrolyte (1 M LiTFSI in DOL/DME, 200 μl) was carefully charged into the spacer without entrainment of bubbles. For the long-term galvanostatic discharge/charge test, 2 mA h cm−2 of Li was first deposited on the current collectors at 0.5 mA cm−2 and the cells were then charged and discharged at 0.2 mA cm−2 for 2.5 h in each half cycle. For the unidirectional galvanostatic polarization (accelerated test for Tsc), Li was continuously plated onto the current collectors from the counter electrode at 0.5 mA cm−2 until short circuit. The average Tsc was obtained from at least three cells for each current collector. For full cells with 3D Cu-based Li-metal anodes, LiFePO4 (Sanxin Industrial) was employed as cathode material. LiFePO4 was casted on an Al foil with an areal capacity density of ∼0.5 mA h cm−2. The 3D Cu was first assembled into a half cell using a Li foil as counter electrode. After plating 1 mA h cm−2 of Li metal into the 3D current collector, Li anode was extracted from the half cell and reassembled into a full cell against LiFePO4 cathode. The electrolyte was the same as that in the half cells (1 M LiTFSI in DOL/DME, 30 μl). Assembly of pouch cells was similar to that of the coin cells. The electrodes (∼42 cm2 in area) were stacked and assembled in a pouch cell. Li anodes plated in the 3D current collector were assembled into a pouch cell against LiFePO4 cathodes with 4 ml of the electrolyte to gain the pouch full cell with a capacity of ∼40 mA h.
Yang C.P., Yin Y.X., Zhang S.F., Li N.W, & Guo Y.G. (2015). Accommodating lithium into 3D current collectors with a submicron skeleton towards long-life lithium metal anodes. Nature Communications, 6, 8058.
Publication 2015
Argon Based metalCelgard Electrolyte Lifepo4 Metal
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Electrolyte composition (1 M LiTFSI in DOL/DME, with or without additives)
dependent variables
Coulombic efficiency
Electrochemical impedance spectra
Cycling stability and cycle life (short-circuit time Tsc) of Li anodes
Performance of full cells with 3D Cu-based Li-metal anodes and LiFePO4 cathodes
control variables
Coin cell assembly in an argon-filled glove box
Li foil as counter/reference electrode
Celgard separator
Deposition of 1 mAh cm^-2 of Li onto the current collector
Charging to 0.5 V (versus Li+/Li) at 0.5 mA cm^-2
Symmetric cell design with hollow spacer substituting for the Celgard separator
LiFePO4 cathode with an areal capacity density of ~0.5 mAh cm^-2
Pouch cell assembly with electrodes of ~42 cm^2 in area and 4 ml of electrolyte
positive controls
None specified
negative controls
None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required