Responses were scored to designate a participant as either an at-risk (score 1–7) or not at-risk drinker (score 0). Some examples of at-risk drinkers include persons who report 1) drinking 3 drinks 4 or more times a week, or 2) drinking 2 or more drinks at least twice a week and often having heartburn, or 3) drinking 2 drinks daily and taking alprazolam at least 3–4 times a week. Of the 2,138 persons eligible for secondary screening, 631 (30%) were at-risk drinkers and agreed to participate in the trial. Approximately one week later at the time of a regular visit with their PCPs (i.e., baseline visit), these participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (310 persons) or control group (321 persons).
Detecting Risky Drinking Behaviors
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of California, Los Angeles
Other organizations : University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Kaiser Permanente, Cheng Ching Hospital, Neurobehavioral Systems, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Ohio University
Protocol cited in 4 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Intervention group
- Control group
- Quantity and frequency of drinking in the past 12 months
- Episodic heavy drinking (4 or more drinks on an occasion) in the past 12 months
- Driving within 2 hours of drinking 3 or more drinks in the past 12 months
- Others being concerned about the respondent's drinking in the past 12 months
- Medical and psychiatric conditions
- Symptoms that could be caused or worsened by alcohol
- Medications that could interact negatively with, or whose efficacy could be diminished by alcohol
- Regular visit with participants' primary care providers (PCPs) at baseline
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!