Pretreatment lymphoma biopsy samples were studied according to a protocol approved by the NCI Institutional Review Board. Lymphoma biopsies were reviewed by a panel of hematopathologists and were found to be DLBCLs morphologically. A “training” set of cases consisted of 36 biopsy specimens from 35 patients for whom the diagnosis of PMBL was considered. These patients all had mediastinal masses of at least 6 cm at presentation. These samples were profiled for gene expression using Lymphochip DNA microarrays comprised of 15,133 cDNA elements as described (3 (link)), and the data are available at http://llmpp.nih.gov/PMBL. A “validation” set of 274 lymphoma samples was previously profiled using Lymphochip DNA microarrays comprised of 12,196 cDNA elements (4 (link)); data for these samples were obtained from http://llmpp.nih.gov/DLBCL. All patients were treated with anthracycline-containing multiagent chemotherapy protocols with some patients additionally receiving radiation therapy. The Bayesian statistical procedure used to create the gene expression-based PMBL predictor has been described (5 ). In the training set of cases, a Bayesian PMBL predictor was constructed from the 46 genes shown in Fig. 2 A. Since cases in the validation set were profiled on Lymphochip microarrays that lacked some of these genes, we constructed another Bayesian PMBL predictor using the 26 discriminating genes that were represented on these microarrays. After demonstrating that this predictor performed identically to the 46-gene predictor on the training set (not shown), it was then used to classify cases in the validation set of cases without reoptimization of the model parameters (Fig. 2 B). Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. P values for survival differences were evaluated using a log-rank test. P values for differences in age group and gender were generated using a chi-squared test. P values for differences in age as a continuous variable were computed using an ANOVA test.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Rosenwald A., Wright G., Leroy K., Yu X., Gaulard P., Gascoyne R.D., Chan W.C., Zhao T., Haioun C., Greiner T.C., Weisenburger D.D., Lynch J.C., Vose J., Armitage J.O., Smeland E.B., Kvaloy S., Holte H., Delabie J., Campo E., Montserrat E., Lopez-Guillermo A., Ott G., Muller-Hermelink H.K., Connors J.M., Braziel R., Grogan T.M., Fisher R.I., Miller T.P., LeBlanc M., Chiorazzi M., Zhao H., Yang L., Powell J., Wilson W.H., Jaffe E.S., Simon R., Klausner R.D, & Staudt L.M. (2003). Molecular Diagnosis of Primary Mediastinal B Cell Lymphoma Identifies a Clinically Favorable Subgroup of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Related to Hodgkin Lymphoma. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 198(6), 851-862.
Other organizations :
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, BC Cancer Agency, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Norwegian Cancer Society, Universitat de Barcelona, University of Würzburg, Oregon Health & Science University, SWOG Cancer Research Network, University of Arizona, University of Rochester, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Center for Cancer Research
Lymphoma biopsies reviewed by a panel of hematopathologists and found to be DLBCLs morphologically
Patients all had mediastinal masses of at least 6 cm at presentation
All patients were treated with anthracycline-containing multiagent chemotherapy protocols, with some patients additionally receiving radiation therapy
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required