Mice were randomized to receive injury or sham injury. Mice randomized to injury underwent 1 of the following injury regimens: (1) 5 daily concussive injuries (n = 7–10/group), (2) 7 concussive injuries in 9 days (n = 8–10/group), (3) 1 concussive injury weekly for 5 weeks (n = 16), (4) 1 concussive injury biweekly for 10 weeks (n = 14), (5) 1 concussive injury monthly for 5 months (n = 16), and (6) 1 concussive injury (n = 15). Sham-injured controls underwent anesthesia exposures (n = 4–12/group) at the same time intervals as injured mice. For all behavioral testing, experimenters were blinded to injury and genotype status, using color coding stored in a password-protected computer. Details of the study flow are found in
Repeated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Boston Children's Museum, Harvard University, Boston Children's Hospital, Sports Concussion Institute, The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention, Massachusetts General Hospital, Tufts University, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Protocol cited in 8 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Injury regimen
- Number of concussive injuries
- Loss of consciousness (LOC) time
- Age of mice (3-month-old males)
- Anesthesia exposure (45 seconds)
- Sham-injured age-matched controls
- Positive control: Sham-injured age-matched control mice underwent anesthesia but not concussive injury.
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!