Twenty four participants (12 men and 12 women) with PD were recruited to participate in the study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: idiopathic PD, Hoehn & Yahr stage below 3, disease duration less than 10 years since disease diagnosis, men and women, age 55–75, lack of disorders that interfere with ability to perform static exercises on vibrating platform, willing to participate in exercise session performed on such platform. The exclusion criteria were: venous thromboembolism, musculoskeletal disorders, implanted endoprosthesis, treated cardiovascular diseases including arrhythmias, neurodegenerative diseases except PD and involvement in intensive physical activity. Subjects’ details are given in Table 1. Additionally, twelve (1 man and 11 women) healthy persons were enrolled into the supplementary group. The details are given in Table 2. All participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Warsaw Medical University in Warsaw.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Niewiadomski W., Gąsiorowska A., Żyliński M., Karbowniczek A., Cebrat J, & Stępniewska A. (2023). Exaggerated pressor response to static squats in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and healthy subjects is likely an individual trait, not influenced by whole body vibration (WBV). Neurorehabilitation, 52(2), 289-298.
Disease duration less than 10 years since diagnosis
Age range: 55-75 years
Lack of disorders that interfere with ability to perform static exercises on vibrating platform
Willing to participate in exercise session performed on vibrating platform
No venous thromboembolism
No musculoskeletal disorders
No implanted endoprosthesis
No treated cardiovascular diseases including arrhythmias
No neurodegenerative diseases except Parkinson's disease
No involvement in intensive physical activity
positive controls
Twelve healthy persons enrolled into the supplementary group
negative controls
None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required