. Considering that there may be deficiencies or errors in the data, it was planned to use a sample size that was 20 times the total number of items in the original scale. Therefore, the study sample was composed of 1,200 volunteers aged 18–64 years who consulted at primary healthcare centers between February and June 2018. Current dieters, foreigners, and participants who did not completely reply to all questions were excluded from the study. Four participants were removed because of missing data and wrong anthropometric measurements. The study was completed with 1,196 participants. Questionnaires were completed at primary healthcare centers via the face-to-face method.
Reliability and Validity of LQ-RC
. Considering that there may be deficiencies or errors in the data, it was planned to use a sample size that was 20 times the total number of items in the original scale. Therefore, the study sample was composed of 1,200 volunteers aged 18–64 years who consulted at primary healthcare centers between February and June 2018. Current dieters, foreigners, and participants who did not completely reply to all questions were excluded from the study. Four participants were removed because of missing data and wrong anthropometric measurements. The study was completed with 1,196 participants. Questionnaires were completed at primary healthcare centers via the face-to-face method.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Erciyes University, Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi
Variable analysis
- Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Dependent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Current dieters
- Foreigners
- Participants who did not completely reply to all questions
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!