Natural Language Processing for Endoscopic Data

All patient data were collected from electronic medical records and endoscopy reports using a natural language processing tool developed in our institution
6 (link)
. Variables collected included patient age, sex, race, and body mass index; EMR details; AEs; colon polyp morphology, pathology, and recurrence; and referral for surgery. Data were collected using a detailed, structured field format in an endoscopic reporting system (EndoWorks; Olympus, Center Valley, Pennsylvania, United States; ProVation Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). Detailed photographic documentation of each EMR was performed, consisting of 20 to 30 photographs per resection. In addition, videos of all large EMRs (n = 120) were uploaded to the EMR Channel at YouTube (
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL43D6FC92ECCD341E) to help with education. Surveillance endoscopy was performed at 6 and 18 months to check for local recurrence of polyp.

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Raju G., Lum P., Ross W., Thirumurthi S., Miller E., Lynch P., Lee J., Bhutani M.S., Shafi M.A., Weston B., Blechacz B., Chang G.J., Hagan K., Rashid A., Davila M, & Stroehlein J. (2019). Quality of endoscopy reporting at index colonoscopy significantly impacts outcome of subsequent EMR in patients with > 20 mm colon polyps. Endoscopy International Open, 7(3), E361-E366.

Publication 2019

EndoWorks

Body mass index Colon polyp Endoscopy Patient Polyp Recurrence Surgery

Corresponding Organization :

Other organizations : The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Patient age
Patient sex
Patient race
Patient body mass index

dependent variables

EMR details
AEs (adverse events)
Colon polyp morphology
Colon polyp pathology
Colon polyp recurrence
Referral for surgery

control variables

Not explicitly mentioned

controls

Surveillance endoscopy at 6 and 18 months to check for local recurrence of polyp

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!