The institution's Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) was the first administrator that was contacted regarding the possibility of implementing the ABCDE bundle into everyday care, followed by the Critical Care Medical Director. Incorporating the Medical Directors' feedback, the research team developed the initial implementation plan. This interprofessional team met on numerous occasions to discuss: how key stakeholders may perceive the bundle, educational strategies (e.g. computer based, in person, etc.), marketing strategies (e.g. with graphics, pocket cards, etc.), evaluation strategies, methods of outcomes assessment, and communication strategies. The research team then collaborated with hospital administrators to identify and formally appoint interdisciplinary (i.e., nursing, PT, RT, pharmacy, and physicians trained in various specialties) ABCDE bundle implementation leaders. While numerous implementation leaders were identified, the most active members included the ICU nursing director, a lead RT, one medical and one surgical CCS physician, an ICU-based PT, 2 pharmacists, 2 assistant nurse managers, and a neurosurgeon with extensive ICU experience. All implementation leaders received a file that described the bundle and supporting studies. We also provided the proposed delirium and sedation/agitation screening tools and resources. The implementation leaders were expected to become familiar with the ABCDE bundle prior to the initial group meeting. At this meeting, the research team and implementation leaders discussed the ABCDE bundle and attempted to identify existing institutional policies related to sedation/analgesia, alcohol withdrawal, ventilator management, and mobility that would support or conflict with the ABCDE bundle. At subsequent meetings, the group discussed the bundles' evidence strength and quality, the relative advantages and disadvantages of change, perceived ABCDE bundle complexity/quality, and potential costs and barriers associated with bundle implementation. Next we identified unit-level leaders. This group included ICU nurse managers, CCS NPs/PAs, nurse educators, the director of respiratory care, an additional ICU pharmacist, other CCS physicians, and members of the performance improvement team. Numerous meetings discussed the same topics as those held with the formal implementation leaders. Each of the unit-level leaders was then asked to identify staff that they thought may be willing to serve as ABCDE bundle champions. The research team then incorporated staff feedback and began the process of developing, obtaining, and distributing educational resources. These resources included a number of different informational posters/flyers, unit-level ABCDE bundle resource manuals, unit and specialty based in-services, and CAM-ICU and RASS pocket cards.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Balas M.C., Burke W.J., Gannon D., Cohen M.Z., Colburn L., Bevil C., Franz D., Olsen K.M., Ely E.W, & Vasilevskis E.E. (2013). Implementing the ABCDE Bundle into Everyday Care: Opportunities, Challenges and Lessons Learned for Implementing the ICU Pain, Agitation and Delirium (PAD) Guidelines. Critical care medicine, 41(9 0 1), S116-S127.
Other organizations :
The Ohio State University, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Vanderbilt University, VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System
Implementation of the ABCDE bundle into everyday care
dependent variables
Perceptions of key stakeholders
Effectiveness of educational strategies (e.g. computer based, in person, etc.)
Effectiveness of marketing strategies (e.g. with graphics, pocket cards, etc.)
Evaluation strategies
Methods of outcomes assessment
Communication strategies
control variables
Existing institutional policies related to sedation/analgesia, alcohol withdrawal, ventilator management, and mobility
positive controls
None specified
negative controls
None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required