The primary antibody was anti-KLF4 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The IHC procedures were performed carried out precisely as described previously (Sun et al., 2016 (link); Sun et al., 2017 (link)). KLF4 staining was classified into three categories based on the intensity of the staining and the percentage of positive cells: weak/negative, moderate, and strong (Wei et al., 2005 (link)). In addition, in order to differentiate between low and high KLF4 expression, negative/weak expression was deemed low, whereas moderate/strong expression was deemed high.
Retrospective Study of KLF4 Expression in HCC
The primary antibody was anti-KLF4 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The IHC procedures were performed carried out precisely as described previously (Sun et al., 2016 (link); Sun et al., 2017 (link)). KLF4 staining was classified into three categories based on the intensity of the staining and the percentage of positive cells: weak/negative, moderate, and strong (Wei et al., 2005 (link)). In addition, in order to differentiate between low and high KLF4 expression, negative/weak expression was deemed low, whereas moderate/strong expression was deemed high.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Academic Degrees & Graduate Education
Variable analysis
- KLF4 staining intensity and percentage of positive cells (weak/negative, moderate, strong)
- Gender
- Hepatitis B virus surface antigens (HBsAg)
- Liver cirrhosis
- α-fetoprotein (AFP)
- Child-Pugh grade
- Tumor size
- Tumor number
- Tumor differentiation grade
- Tumor distribution
- Pathological Tumor Node Metastasis stage (TNM stage)
- Availability of baseline data and histologic material
- HCC diagnosis by a physician based on unambiguous histologic characteristics
- Informed consent from all patients
- Adherence to ethical standards
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!