We used R version 4.03 (R-Studio Version 1.2.5033) and lme441 to perform a linear mixed effects analysis of the relationship between the OPUS outcomes and clinical need. As fixed effects, we entered age, gender, and evaluation point (tested for interaction with “clinical need”) into the model. As random effects, we had intercepts for subjects and investigators, as well as by-subject and by-item random slopes for the effect of clinical need. P-values were obtained by likelihood ratio tests of the full model with the effect in question against the model without the effect in question. For comparison of individual OPUS items, the Benjamini & Hochberg method was used to control for Type I error due to multiple comparisons.42
Analyzing OPUS Outcomes in Amputees
We used R version 4.03 (R-Studio Version 1.2.5033) and lme441 to perform a linear mixed effects analysis of the relationship between the OPUS outcomes and clinical need. As fixed effects, we entered age, gender, and evaluation point (tested for interaction with “clinical need”) into the model. As random effects, we had intercepts for subjects and investigators, as well as by-subject and by-item random slopes for the effect of clinical need. P-values were obtained by likelihood ratio tests of the full model with the effect in question against the model without the effect in question. For comparison of individual OPUS items, the Benjamini & Hochberg method was used to control for Type I error due to multiple comparisons.42
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Össur (Iceland), Kista Photonics Research Center
Variable analysis
- Gender
- Evaluation point (tested for interaction with 'clinical need')
- OPUS outcomes
- By-subject and by-item random slopes for the effect of clinical need
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!