The age groups were classified using 10-year intervals. A total of eight groups aged ≥20 years old were included. The household income groups initially provided with 11 classes (class 0, lowest income; class 10, highest income) from the NHIS database were recategorized into three groups (low, class 0–2; medium, class 3–7; high, class 8–10). The region of residence was recategorized into urban (Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan) and rural (Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Chungcheongbuk, Chungcheongnam, Jeollabuk, Jeollanam, Gyeongsangbuk, Gyeongsangnam, and Jeju). The patients’ CCI scores were estimated from their disease records using previously validated algorithms [25 (link)]. Smoking status was categorized as current smoker, ex-smoker, and never smoked. BMI was calculated as an individual’s body weight in kilograms divided by their height in meters squared (kg/m2). In this study, BMI was categorized into underweight (BMI less than 18 kg/m2), normal (BMI between 18 to 25 kg/m2), and overweight (BMI more than 25 kg/m2). Co-medications, such as calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, felodipine, flunarizine, isradipine, levamlodipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, diltiazem, and verapamil), antidepressants (amitriptyline, amoxapine, clomipramine, desipramine, doxepin, imipramine, maprotiline, nortriptyline, protriptyline, and trimipramine), theophylline, and anticholinergic drugs (benztropine, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, isopropamide, and scopolamine), which are known to contribute to the development of GERD, were also considered as covariates if the medication was used for more than 60 days between the index date and the last observation date.
Controlling Confounding Factors in GERD Analysis
The age groups were classified using 10-year intervals. A total of eight groups aged ≥20 years old were included. The household income groups initially provided with 11 classes (class 0, lowest income; class 10, highest income) from the NHIS database were recategorized into three groups (low, class 0–2; medium, class 3–7; high, class 8–10). The region of residence was recategorized into urban (Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, and Ulsan) and rural (Gyeonggi, Gangwon, Chungcheongbuk, Chungcheongnam, Jeollabuk, Jeollanam, Gyeongsangbuk, Gyeongsangnam, and Jeju). The patients’ CCI scores were estimated from their disease records using previously validated algorithms [25 (link)]. Smoking status was categorized as current smoker, ex-smoker, and never smoked. BMI was calculated as an individual’s body weight in kilograms divided by their height in meters squared (kg/m2). In this study, BMI was categorized into underweight (BMI less than 18 kg/m2), normal (BMI between 18 to 25 kg/m2), and overweight (BMI more than 25 kg/m2). Co-medications, such as calcium channel blockers (amlodipine, felodipine, flunarizine, isradipine, levamlodipine, nicardipine, nifedipine, nimodipine, nisoldipine, diltiazem, and verapamil), antidepressants (amitriptyline, amoxapine, clomipramine, desipramine, doxepin, imipramine, maprotiline, nortriptyline, protriptyline, and trimipramine), theophylline, and anticholinergic drugs (benztropine, dicyclomine, hyoscyamine, isopropamide, and scopolamine), which are known to contribute to the development of GERD, were also considered as covariates if the medication was used for more than 60 days between the index date and the last observation date.
Corresponding Organization : Korea University
Other organizations : Korea University Medical Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Variable analysis
- Age_groups
- Household_income
- Region_of_residence
- Disability
- Charlson_comorbidity_index_score
- Smoking_status
- Body_mass_index
- Co_medications
- Baseline_year
- Not_explicitly_mentioned
- Age_groups
- Household_income
- Region_of_residence
- Disability
- Charlson_comorbidity_index_score
- Smoking_status
- Body_mass_index
- Co_medications
- Baseline_year
- Not_specified
- Not_specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!