Extracranial BoNT-A Injections and Meningeal Nociceptor Responses
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 150–170 g were briefly anesthetized (2% isoflurane) and injected with BoNT-A (onabotulinumtoxinA; final dose = 5 units) using two different injection paradigms. In the first paradigm, four injections of BoNT-A (each containing 1.25 units diluted in 5 μl saline) were made along the lambdoid (two injection sites) and sagittal (two injection sites) sutures (Figure 1(a)). In the second paradigm, eight BoNT-A injections (each containing 0.625 units) were made: two along the sagittal suture, two in the temporalis muscle and four in the trapezius muscle (Figure 1(b)). All injections were given at the animal facility between 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. Seven days later, injected rats (by now weighing 250–300 g—housed in a specific pathogen-free facility equipped with solid bottom cages of 1800 cm2 of floor space and hardwood chip bedding; kept at 12 hours light/dark cycle, 22–26℃, and inspected twice daily for signs of stress or discomfort) were anesthetized with urethane (1.8 g/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.)) and prepared for single-unit recording of C- and Aδ-meningeal nociceptors. All electrophysiological experiments were carried out between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. in a room especially fitted for electrophysiological recording in deeply anesthetized rats. To test for effects of extracranial injections of BoNT-A on responses of meningeal nociceptors to stimulation of their intracranial (dural) receptive fields, testing determined mechanical response threshold and responses to topical application of the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin and the TRPA1 agonist MO. For comparisons, similar experiments were carried out in 47 naïve and 25 sham rats (i.e. rats in which recordings were made seven days after they were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane and injected with vehicle at the same sites as the muscle-plus-suture group). As the results from the two control groups were very similar (e.g. scatterplots in Figure 2(b) and (c)) and not statistically different, they were combined for statistical comparisons.
Injection paradigm. (a) The suture paradigm consisted of four injections of BoNT-A, each containing 1.25 units, along the superior sagittal and transverse sinuses. (b) The suture-plus-muscle paradigm consisted of eight injections of BoNT-A, each containing 0.625 units. As depicted by the red dots, four injections were made in the clavicotrapezius muscle, two in the temporalis muscle, and two along the superior sagittal suture. BoNT-A: onabotulinumtoxinA.
Mechanical threshold for activation of C- and Aδ-meningeal nociceptors from their dural receptive fields are not affected by extracranial BoNT-A injections. (a) Mechanical response threshold of three different C-type meningeal nociceptors recorded in control rat (top), and in rats treated seven days earlier with BoNT-A injections into the sutures (middle) or the suture plus muscles (bottom). Boxed inset in each plot shows the shock artifact, the spike waveform, and the response latency. (b), (c) Mechanical thresholds for all C-units (b) and Aδ-units (c), shown as scattergraphs (top) and boxplots (bottom). Blue, control rats; red, suture-injected rats; green, suture-plus-muscle injected rats. In the scatterplots for the control rats, the filled and open circles represent values recorded in naïve and saline-injected rats, respectively. Boxplots illustrate median (thick horizontal line), interquartile range (25th–75th percentile; lower and upper box boundaries) and observations below and above the 25th and 75th percentile (whiskers) of the mechanical response threshold. Note that mechanical threshold values represent the smallest mechanical force capable of activating the neurons (i.e. innocuous force). BoNT-A: onabotulinumtoxinA.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Zhang X., Strassman A.M., Novack V., Brin M.F, & Burstein R. (2016). Extracranial injections of botulinum neurotoxin type A inhibit intracranial meningeal nociceptors’ responses to stimulation of TRPV1 and TRPA1 channels: Are we getting closer to solving this puzzle?. Cephalalgia, 36(9), 875-886.
Injection paradigm: 1) Four injections of BoNT-A (1.25 units each) along the lambdoid and sagittal sutures, 2) Eight injections of BoNT-A (0.625 units each) in the sagittal suture, temporalis muscle, and trapezius muscle
dependent variables
Mechanical response threshold of C-type and Aδ-type meningeal nociceptors
Responses to topical application of the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin and the TRPA1 agonist MO on the meningeal nociceptors
control variables
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 150–170 g
Rats were briefly anesthetized with 2% isoflurane for the injections
Rats were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility with 1800 cm^2 of floor space and hardwood chip bedding, kept at 12 hours light/dark cycle and 22–26°C
Rats were inspected twice daily for signs of stress or discomfort
Electrophysiological experiments were carried out between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. in a room fitted for electrophysiological recording in deeply anesthetized rats
controls
Positive controls: 47 naïve rats and 25 sham rats (anesthetized with 2% isoflurane and injected with vehicle at the same sites as the muscle-plus-suture group)
The results from the two control groups were very similar and not statistically different, so they were combined for statistical comparisons
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required