To assess congruence, maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees were constructed using Paup version 4 beta 10 (Swofford, 1998 ) on finished genomes from the entire Bacilli class (n=144). ML trees for ten ribosomal protein genes (rpsB, rpsC, rpsD, rpsE, rpsG, rpsI, rpsK, rpsL, rpsP and rpsT) with sizes between 400 – 1100 bp were computed and compared using the Shimodaira-Hasegawa test, which determines if significant differences occur among the tree topologies (differences in log likelihood, Δ-ln L). Randomisation tests were then performed (Holmes et al., 1999 (link)), where the Δ –ln L values for each of the genes were compared to the equivalent values computed for 200 random trees created from each gene. This analysis was carried out on finished genomes from the entire Bacilli class (n=144).
Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial Genomes
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Oxford
Protocol cited in 60 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Phylogenetic tree generation method
- Alignment and concatenation of sequence data
- Choice of phylogenetic analysis software (ClonalFrame, Mega, SplitsTree, Paup)
- Phylogenetic tree topologies
- Significance of differences in tree topologies (Δ-ln L)
- Congruence between phylogenetic trees
- Default parameters used for ClonalFrame analysis
- Removal of ambiguous positions for Neighbor-joining tree analysis
- Positive control: Not specified
- Negative control: Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!