The genotype data we downloaded comprised 93,095,623 imputed SNPs for 487,411 individuals. We conducted the following preprocessing steps on the genotype data: initially, we excluded SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 0.01 and an imputation INFO score of less than 0.8. Subsequently, we retained SNPs with a genotype call probability greater than 0.9 using the qctool. We also ensured that only biallelic SNPs were included. Finally, we excluded SNPs with a P value of less than 10−6 based on Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium testing and those with a genotype missing rate greater than 0.05 for both White and non-White British populations.
UK Biobank Genotype Data Preprocessing
The genotype data we downloaded comprised 93,095,623 imputed SNPs for 487,411 individuals. We conducted the following preprocessing steps on the genotype data: initially, we excluded SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 0.01 and an imputation INFO score of less than 0.8. Subsequently, we retained SNPs with a genotype call probability greater than 0.9 using the qctool. We also ensured that only biallelic SNPs were included. Finally, we excluded SNPs with a P value of less than 10−6 based on Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium testing and those with a genotype missing rate greater than 0.05 for both White and non-White British populations.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Sun Yat-sen University
Variable analysis
- No independent variables explicitly mentioned.
- No dependent variables explicitly mentioned.
- Participants were individuals aged between 40 and 69 years, primarily of White British ancestry, with a minority representing other ancestries.
- SNPs with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 0.01 and an imputation INFO score of less than 0.8 were excluded.
- SNPs with a genotype call probability greater than 0.9 were retained using the qctool.
- Only biallelic SNPs were included.
- SNPs with a P value of less than 10^-6 based on Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium testing and those with a genotype missing rate greater than 0.05 for both White and non-White British populations were excluded.
- No positive controls explicitly mentioned.
- No negative controls explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!