The evolution tree of the concatenated sequences of the seven loci was built based on the method of the Kimura-2-parameter in Mega 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013 (link)). The ratio between the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions, showing the type of selection at each locus, was calculated using the method of Nei and Gojobori in Mega 6. The hypotheses of neutrality (dS = dN), purifying selection (dS/dN >1), and positive selection (dS/dN < 1) were tested using DNAsp 5.10 (Lüdeke et al., 2015 (link)).
Multilocus Sequence Typing of Vibrio parahaemolyticus
The evolution tree of the concatenated sequences of the seven loci was built based on the method of the Kimura-2-parameter in Mega 6.0 (Tamura et al., 2013 (link)). The ratio between the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions, showing the type of selection at each locus, was calculated using the method of Nei and Gojobori in Mega 6. The hypotheses of neutrality (dS = dN), purifying selection (dS/dN >1), and positive selection (dS/dN < 1) were tested using DNAsp 5.10 (Lüdeke et al., 2015 (link)).
Corresponding Organization : Guangdong Academy of Sciences
Other organizations : South China University of Technology
Variable analysis
- PCR conditions: denaturation at 96°C for 1 min, primer annealing at 58°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, for 30 cycles; with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min
- Sequences of the seven loci used for MLST analysis
- Allele numbers and ST profiles assigned based on the sequences
- Ratio between the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions at each locus
- Primer sequences (Table S1)
- Use of the V. parahaemolyticus MLST website and database for sequence analysis and assignment of allele numbers and ST profiles
- Use of BioEdit for sequence alignment
- Use of Mega 6.0 for phylogenetic tree construction and calculation of dS/dN ratios
- Use of DNAsp 5.10 for testing hypotheses of neutrality, purifying selection, and positive selection
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!