The narrow cuffs were applied with an initial compressive force between 40 and 60 mmHg (Karabulut et al. 2011b (link)). The wide cuffs were applied tightly around the upper thigh; however, the device which inflates the wide cuffs does not allow an initial compressive force to be set. The narrow cuffs were connected to a Kaatsu Master Cuff inflator (Sato Sports Plaza, Tokyo, Japan); the wide cuffs were connected to an E 20 Rapid Cuff Inflator (Hokanson, Bellevue, WA). Both devices adjust cuff pressure automatically and actual cuff pressures were confirmed on the machines’ digital window. The same inflation protocol was used for both types of cuffs. The cuffs were first inflated to 50 mmHg for 30 s and then deflated for 10 s. Cuffs were then inflated to the subject’s SBP for 30 s and then deflated for 10 s. Cuff pressure was then increased incrementally by 40 mmHg (30 s inflation followed by a 10 s deflation) until the arterial flow was no longer detected during inflation. When arterial flow was no longer detected, cuff pressure was decreased in 10 mmHg units until arterial flow was present. Arterial occlusion pressure was recorded to the nearest 10 mmHg as the lowest cuff pressure at which a pulse was not present. This process was repeated with both the wide and narrow cuff devices with 5 min rest allotted between the procedures. Cuff pressures were increased up to but not over 300 mmHg. If subjects still had a detectable pulse at 300 mmHg cuff pressure, arterial occlusion pressure was recorded as “300 + mmHg.” Subjects in which arterial occlusion did not occur with the narrow cuffs were not included in the regression analysis (explained below).
Comparing Arterial Occlusion Using Cuff Widths
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Oklahoma, The University of Tokyo
Protocol cited in 13 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Wide cuffs (Hokanson, SC12, Bellevue, WA; 13.5 cm × 83 cm)
- Narrow cuffs (Kaatsu Master, Sato Sports Plaza, Tokyo Japan; 5 cm × 135 cm)
- Arterial occlusion pressure
- Subjects were in a supine position
- Cuffs were applied to the most proximal portion of each leg
- Pulse at the ankle (arterial blood flow) was detected using a hand-held bidirectional Doppler probe placed on the posterior tibial artery
- Initial compressive force for narrow cuffs was between 40 and 60 mmHg
- Wide cuffs were applied tightly around the upper thigh
- Cuffs were inflated to 50 mmHg for 30 s and then deflated for 10 s, followed by inflation to the subject's SBP for 30 s and then deflated for 10 s, and then increased incrementally by 40 mmHg (30 s inflation followed by a 10 s deflation) until the arterial flow was no longer detected during inflation
- Cuff pressure was then decreased in 10 mmHg units until arterial flow was present
- Cuff pressures were increased up to but not over 300 mmHg
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!