The KneeKG™ system consists of a harness that reduces STAs and a calibration method that combines anatomical calibration, i.e. manual identification of anatomical points, and functional calibration, i.e. specific movements to identify axis and joint centres [5 (link)]. To avoid discrepancies in axis definition that would result in kinematic differences, the lower-limb geometry measured with the CAS system was introduced into the gait measurements using the calibration procedure described below.
First, a kinematic chain was defined based on the calibration of the CAS system, with a pivot at the knee and spherical joints at the hip and ankle. The pivot’s axis was based on the flexion–extension axis (wf) estimated during CAS. The kinematic chain was introduced into the treadmill gait measurements using a two-level multi-body kinematics optimisation [13 (link)], where the variables to optimise were the fully Cartesian coordinates (uf, rPf, rDf, wf, ut, rPt, rDt, wt) and the positions of the reflective markers with respect to this kinematic chain. The outcome of the optimisation determined the optimal position of the kinematic chain, i.e. joint centres and flexion-extension axis, with respect to the thigh and shank clusters of the KneeKG™ system. These positions were used as the final calibration for the KneeKG™ system. In this way, the six degrees of freedom (DoF) kinematics were computed with the femur and tibia LCS matching those used during the CAS measurement.
Free full text: Click here