Patient-Reported Outcomes for Breast Reconstruction
A single-center, prospective, comparative, patient-reported outcomes study was performed in patients who underwent fat grafting as an ancillary treatment after breast reconstruction at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal. This study was approved by the institutional ethics review board, and recruited patients scheduled for fat grafting after breast reconstruction between February 2016 and July 2018. The same group of plastic surgeons performed all procedures. The indications for lipofilling were one or more of the following: hollowness (cavity), deformity (disruption of the form or shape of the breast), asymmetry, volume deficit, visible implant, rippling, or lack of projection. Eligible patients included patients aged 18 years and older with an indication of fat grafting after breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy with an implant or flap-based reconstruction. Patients who did not provide consent for the study, did not complete preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q questionnaires, or were lost to follow-up were excluded.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Retchkiman M., Elkhatib A., Efanov J.I., Gagnon A., Bou-Merhi J., Danino M.A, & Bernier C. (2023). BREAST-Q Patient-reported Outcomes in Different Types of Breast Reconstruction after Fat Grafting. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 11(2), e4814.
Publication 2023
Breast Breast conserving surgery Breast reconstruction Cavity Deformity FlapPatients ReconstructionSurgeons Total mastectomy
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Creative Commons, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fat grafting as an ancillary treatment after breast reconstruction
dependent variables
Patient-reported outcomes
control variables
Patients aged 18 years and older with an indication of fat grafting after breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy with an implant or flap-based reconstruction
Patients who provided consent for the study
Patients who completed preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q questionnaires
Patients who were not lost to follow-up
Procedures performed by the same group of plastic surgeons
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required