Evaluation of qPCR and iELISA Diagnostic Assays for ASF
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Minnesota, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Tetracore (United States), Iowa State University
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Performance of the two diagnostic assays, qPCR and iELISA, on serum and OF samples
- Farm type (acutely ASF-affected, chronically affected, and unaffected)
- Geographical location (17 provinces in Vietnam)
- Sample type (paired individual serum and OF samples)
- Number of samples per farm (1-10 for acute/chronic, 10 for unaffected)
- Pig age group category
- Overall health status of the pigs
- General vaccination status
- Positive control: None explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!