The 4-week length of the study was based on the time needed to evaluate non-specific symptoms such as fatigue [9 (link)]. The training program (futsal/soccer practice) and exercise regimen for participating male athletes were continued for 4 consecutive weeks (site-1). While the female athletes (site-2) were instructed to execute their habitual exercise at least once a week for about 60 min duration with sweating. Featured exercises performed during the 4 weeks study period were mainly hot yoga, dance exercise, martial art exercise, resistance movements, underwater exercise/swimming, and running/walking. Participants of both groups were asked to record their exercise to ensure that all participants remained in identical physical energy balance during the fitness training during the four weeks study period. A schematic protocol illustration is presented in Fig. 1. Participating male and female athletes were registered for the study at two separate sites after confirmation of their eligibility according to set inclusion/exclusion criteria. All participants were asked to visit their respective testing laboratories at trial sites three times during the four-week study period. During the participant's initial visit (baseline) to the laboratory, a self-completed Profile of Mood State (POMS) questionnaire, and an exercise and well-being related Fatigue-Sweat questionnaire were administrated to male athletes to assess the effect of dietary iron supplementation on quality of life including fatigue and mood symptoms by assessing a range of associated domains. On the other hand, the state level of fatigue and related subscale subjective lifestyle quality parameters including sweating behavior among female athletes were measured with a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire. The two different questionnaires, VAS and POMS were used for female and male athletic subjects, respectively, because the data collection was based on the required intensities of sweating exercise and metabolism behavior differences among female and male athletes. However, the purpose and questions asked in both questionnaires were interrelated to retain the identical outcomes of the study. Each participant completed the study questionnaires at baseline, after two weeks (mid-point), and after four weeks of the study (end-point). Mood, stress, and sweat behavior were analyzed using the scores obtained from questionnaires.
Schematic illustration of experimental design of study protocol and procedures.
Fig. 1The anthropometric, body temperature and heart rate were measured for each participant during every laboratory visit. Noninvasive measurement of hemoglobin levels, which measures estimated hemoglobin levels in peripheral blood vessels was performed to scientifically monitor the participating athletes' conditioning on each visit to the laboratory during the study period. Furthermore, to determine the changes in stress markers during the study, saliva samples were collected at the beginning and end of the study, in order, to measure the salivary cortisol, salivary α-amylase, and salivary-immunoglobulin A concentrations.
Kapoor M.P., Sugita M., Kawaguchi M., Timm D., Kawamura A., Abe A, & Okubo T. (2023). Influence of iron supplementation on fatigue, mood states and sweating profiles of healthy non-anemic athletes during a training exercise: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 32, 101084.
Training program (futsal/soccer practice) and exercise regimen for participating male athletes
Habitual exercise at least once a week for about 60 min duration with sweating for female athletes
dependent variables
Fatigue and mood symptoms
Stress markers (salivary cortisol, salivary α-amylase, and salivary-immunoglobulin A concentrations)
Mood, stress, and sweat behavior
control variables
Participants were asked to record their exercise to ensure that all participants remained in identical physical energy balance during the fitness training during the four weeks study period
controls
No explicit positive or negative controls were mentioned in the provided information.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required