For each RMCE event, 4 PCR reactions were performed: a first PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-F and Tag-R, a second PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-F and Tag-F, a third PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-R and Tag-R, and a fourth PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-R and Tag-F. Since the transposon integrates one or two orientations relative to the gene, only one in two RMCE events is productive with respect to creating a gene trap or protein trap, which is reflected in a positive PCR for reactions 1 and 4, or 2 and 3. A “1/4” PCR pattern is always desired for a productive RMCE event (for example a gene or protein trap), when the gene/transposon configuration is 1/1 or −1/−1. Conversely, a “2/3” PCR pattern is diagnostic of a productive RMCE event, when the gene/transposon configuration is 1/−1 or −1/1. The reverse holds for unproductive RMCE events (
PCR Verification of RMCE Integration
For each RMCE event, 4 PCR reactions were performed: a first PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-F and Tag-R, a second PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-F and Tag-F, a third PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-R and Tag-R, and a fourth PCR reaction with primers Orientation-MiL-R and Tag-F. Since the transposon integrates one or two orientations relative to the gene, only one in two RMCE events is productive with respect to creating a gene trap or protein trap, which is reflected in a positive PCR for reactions 1 and 4, or 2 and 3. A “1/4” PCR pattern is always desired for a productive RMCE event (for example a gene or protein trap), when the gene/transposon configuration is 1/1 or −1/−1. Conversely, a “2/3” PCR pattern is diagnostic of a productive RMCE event, when the gene/transposon configuration is 1/−1 or −1/1. The reverse holds for unproductive RMCE events (
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Baylor College of Medicine
Other organizations : Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Embryology, Carnegie Institution for Science
Protocol cited in 37 other protocols
Variable analysis
- DNA extraction method (PureLink™ Genomic DNA Mini Kit)
- PCR primers (tag-specific primers and MiMIC specific primers)
- PCR amplification and detection of RMCE integration events
- Number of adult flies used for DNA extraction (10 to 15)
- PCR reaction conditions (1 μl DNA, 1 μl primer 1, 1 μl primer 2, 2 μl 10× Buffer, 0.16 μl dNTPs, 0.08 μl Qiagen HotStarTaq DNA Polymerase, 14.76 μl milliQ water)
- PCR cycling conditions (denaturation at 94° for 10 minutes, 40 cycles at 94° for 30 seconds, 60° for 30 seconds and 72° for 60 seconds, and post-amplification extension at 72° for 10 minutes)
- Positive controls: None mentioned
- Negative controls: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!