Longitudinal Neuroimaging Study of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Sixty-three children and adolescents (38 ASD, 25 TD, 7–14 years) were recruited for this neuroimaging study at the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), between 2011 and 2013 (Vogan et al., 2019 (link)). All participants were invited back two years later (9–16 years) for a follow-up study. Of the 63 participants, 18 (12 ASD, 7 TD) did not return for the follow-up study due to relocation, declined to participate, had contraindications for MEG (e.g., braces), or were lost to follow-up. MEG data from 13 additional participants (10 ASD and 3 TD) were excluded from analyses due to a) sex matching; b) <20 clean MEG trials; and c) <55% task accuracy. Thus, the final sample consisted of 64 datasets from 17 children with ASD and 15 age- and sex-matched TD controls. The final sample differed slightly for the 2-back memory load condition due to increased task difficulty (58 datasets: 15 ASD, 14 TD). Importantly, as previously reported by Vogan et al. (2019) (link), the participants that returned at follow-up did not significantly differ from those who did not return in terms of age, sex, and IQ. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board at SickKids. Written informed consent was obtained by a parent or legal guardian, and informed verbal assent was provided by all children. For TD controls, exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of a learning, language or neurodevelopmental disorder; for both groups exclusion criteria also included history of prematurity, severe neurological damage, uncorrected visual impairment or colour blindness and IQ < 70. For children in the ASD group, a primary diagnosis of ASD was confirmed by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Second Edition (ADOS-2; Lord et al., 2012 ) by expert clinicians. A summary of the demographic characteristics is shown in Table 1.
Participant demographics.
Time point
ASD (n = 17)
TD (n = 15)
Significance test
M (SD) or count
M (SD) or count
Sex (M:F)
Baseline
15:2
8:7
p = 0.05†
Age (years)
BaselineFollow-up
11.13 (1.83)13.50 (1.58)
10.69 (2.32)12.91 (2.29)
t(30) = 0.59, p = 0.56t(30) = 0.85, p = 0.40
ADOS-2
BaselineFollow-up
6.29 (2.05)7.13 (2.28)
–
–
†A Fisher’s exact test was used to test for differences in the proportion of boys and girls between-groups.
Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) was measured using the two sub-test version of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI; Wechsler, 2013 (link)) for all children at both time points. FSIQ scores were estimated based on performance on the Vocabulary and Matrix reasoning sub-tests. To assess working memory ability, two sub-tests of the Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C) (Gathercole & Pickering, 2000 (link)) were administered (Digit Recall and Block Recall). Parents also completed questionnaires on executive function abilities and social impairment using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF; Gioia et al., 2000 ) and the Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition (SRS-2; Constantino, 2012 ), respectively.
Sato J., Safar K., Vogan V.M, & Taylor M.J. (2023). Functional connectivity changes during working memory in autism spectrum disorder: A two-year longitudinal MEG study. NeuroImage : Clinical, 37, 103364.
Publication 2023
Adolescents Ados AutismBoysBraces Children Colour blindness Diagnostic DigitExecutive function Girls Intelligence test Legal guardian Memory condition Neurodevelopmental disorder Neurological damage Parents Prematurity Recall Visual impairment Working memory
Corresponding Organization : Hospital for Sick Children
Other organizations :
Institute for Christian Studies, University of Toronto
Negative control: Exclusion criteria included learning, language or neurodevelopmental disorders, prematurity, severe neurological damage, uncorrected visual impairment or colour blindness, and IQ < 70.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required