The measurement of CT value, which was designed referring to the research of Yu et al. [14 (link)], was as follows: three region-of-interest (ROI) in the liver and two ROIs in the spleen were selected at the level of porta hepatis to avoid blood vessels, bile ducts, and calcification. Each ROI was a circle of about 300 mm2. The respective means of the 3 CT values of the liver and 2 CT values of the spleen were calculated as the liver and the spleen CT value. The liver/spleen CT ratio, defined as liver CT value to spleen CT value, was calculated to reflect the degree of steatosis, which determined the severity of MAFLD.
Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis via CT
The measurement of CT value, which was designed referring to the research of Yu et al. [14 (link)], was as follows: three region-of-interest (ROI) in the liver and two ROIs in the spleen were selected at the level of porta hepatis to avoid blood vessels, bile ducts, and calcification. Each ROI was a circle of about 300 mm2. The respective means of the 3 CT values of the liver and 2 CT values of the spleen were calculated as the liver and the spleen CT value. The liver/spleen CT ratio, defined as liver CT value to spleen CT value, was calculated to reflect the degree of steatosis, which determined the severity of MAFLD.
Corresponding Organization : China-Japan Friendship Hospital
Other organizations : Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Guang’anmen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Liver CT value
- Spleen CT value
- Liver/Spleen CT ratio
- Scan parameters: tube voltage (120 kV), tube current (250 mA), slice thickness and interval (5 mm), field of view (40 cm × 40 cm), window level (40 Hu), window width (400 Hu)
- Subject positioning: supine position, fasting overnight, breath-hold at the end of exhalation
- Scan region: from the top of the diaphragm to the lower costal margin
- None mentioned
- None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!