Iba-1 stained sections were analyzed by phenotype scoring, using a modified version of a previously described scoring method [35 (link),36 (link)]. Briefly, affected brain regions (striatum, upper and lower cortex, cerebral peduncle, globus pallidus and substantia nigra) were given a score 0-4, based on microglial phenotype and accumulation (Supplementary Figure S1). Each region was scored using a light microscope (Olympus) with three 20× magnified pictures at each level. A mean score for each region was calculated at each level, and then a mean for the region throughout the different levels in which the region was present.
Quantifying Focal Ischemic Injury in Rodents
Iba-1 stained sections were analyzed by phenotype scoring, using a modified version of a previously described scoring method [35 (link),36 (link)]. Briefly, affected brain regions (striatum, upper and lower cortex, cerebral peduncle, globus pallidus and substantia nigra) were given a score 0-4, based on microglial phenotype and accumulation (Supplementary Figure S1). Each region was scored using a light microscope (Olympus) with three 20× magnified pictures at each level. A mean score for each region was calculated at each level, and then a mean for the region throughout the different levels in which the region was present.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Gothenburg, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm South General Hospital
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- MAP2 staining
- Infarct size (whole hemisphere and cortex specifically)
- Iba-1 stained microglial phenotype and accumulation scores (striatum, upper and lower cortex, cerebral peduncle, globus pallidus and substantia nigra)
- MAP2-stained area of the contralateral hemisphere
- Blinding of quantifications
- Positive control: Contralateral MAP2-stained area (used to calculate infarct size)
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!