Cross-sectional Study on Caregiver Burden Assessment
The present cross-sectional study was conducted in accordance with the Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0 - checklist) for the description of the results. The sample consisted of 341 persons who met the following inclusion criteria, aged 60 years or older; performed the role of caregiver of their elderly dependent family member living in the same household, and enrolled in one of the primary healthcare centers in the city of São Carlos, state of São Paulo, Brazil, located 235 km from the state capital. The exclusion criterion of the research was refusal by the participant to sign the Free and Informed Consent Form. The degree of dependence of the elderly dependent on care was verified using the evaluation of the level of dependence for basic and instrumental activities of daily living analyzed by the Katz Index and Lawton and Brody’s Scale. The data were collected by an oral interview, where carers with cognitive deficits were excluded with self-report. Therefore, interviewees who could understand and complete the data collection instruments were selected for the study. The interview was conducted at the homes of the participants between April and November 2014 by students and health professionals who had undergone training for the administration of the following data collection instruments: For the identification of an assessment tool that could serve as the standard reference, the following were also administered to the participants: This study was conducted in accordance with all ethical precepts that govern research involving human subjects and received approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal de São Carlos (certificate numbers: 416.467/2013 and 711.592/2014). All participants signed a statement of informed consent prior to the onset of the data collection process, and the care recipients that were completely dependent (13.5%) were consented by the legal guardian, who was predominantly represented by the caregiver. The data were entered in a double-blinded dataset in MS Excel 2010. The SPSS program version 21.0 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for the data analysis. The data presented adherence to normality, as verified by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and therefore parametric statistical tests were run. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe the sample (Table 1). Internal consistency of the ZBI-12 was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, considering α > 0.8 to be indicative of very good to excellent internal consistency. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the item-item and item-score evaluations to determine the strength of the internal correlation of each item. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to analyze the strength of correlations between the ZBI-12 items and total GDS, PSS and L&B scale scores for the determination of the standard reference (Table 2). To suggest a cut-off point for the ZBI-12, the PSS scores were divided into quartiles and four groups created. For each group, the mean and standard-deviation of ZBI-12 were reported. The mean value on the ZBI-12 for the highest group was the suggested cut-off point (Table 3). One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used for the comparison of mean ZBI-12 scores according to the PSS quartiles. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered indicative of statistical significance.
Gratão A.C., Brigola A.G., Ottaviani A.C., Luchesi B.M., Souza É.N., Rossetti E.S., de Oliveira N.A., Terassi M, & Pavarini S.C. (2019). Brief version of Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) for burden assessment in older caregivers. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 13(1), 122-129.
Publication 2019
Anova Cognitive deficits Determination b Elderly Family caregiver Health professionals Household Human Legal guardian Primary healthcare Research ethics committee Students
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul
Degree of dependence of the elderly dependent on care (evaluated using the Katz Index and Lawton and Brody's Scale)
Caregiver burden (measured using the Zarit Burden Interview - 12 item scale (ZBI-12))
Perceived stress (measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS))
Depressive symptoms (measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS))
control variables
Inclusion criteria: aged 60 years or older, performed the role of caregiver of their elderly dependent family member living in the same household, and enrolled in one of the primary healthcare centers in the city of São Carlos, state of São Paulo, Brazil
Exclusion criterion: refusal by the participant to sign the Free and Informed Consent Form
Participants with cognitive deficits were excluded based on self-report
positive controls
None explicitly mentioned
negative controls
None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required