Slit lamp (ZEISS, Jena, Germany) examinations and in vivo photographs of corneas were performed on days 7 and 14 after alkali burn injury. Each group contained 6 eyes at each time point. The CNV area was quantified, as previously reported (15 (link)). On day 7, 0.5% fluorescein sodium salt was used to detect corneal epithelial defects. Each epithelial defect area was evaluated using ImageJ software (imagej.nih.gov/il/; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The percentage of epithelial defect area referred to the area of epithelial defect of each eye as compared to the area of the entire cornea.
Protocol detail
Corneal Epithelial Defects After Alkali Burn
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Sun Yat-sen University
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- Time after alkali burn injury (7 and 14 days)
- CNV area
- Corneal epithelial defect area
- Number of eyes in each group (6 eyes)
- Use of 0.5% fluorescein sodium salt to detect corneal epithelial defects
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!